|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +title: Semantics |
| 3 | +date: 2025-06-10/11 |
| 4 | +--- |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +# Semantics |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +## Semantics vs. Pragmatics |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +## Defining semantics |
| 11 | +Hypothesis 1: meanings are paraphrases (circular) |
| 12 | +Hypothesis 2: Meanings are concepts and ideas (Different ideas in different people's mind, hard to represent some words.) |
| 13 | +Hypothesis 3: Meanings are out in the world. |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +## Sentence meanings and truth conditions |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +### Truth is relative |
| 18 | +Given a certain condition, we can judge the truth value of a sentence. |
| 19 | +We only need to know *what the world should be like* for a sentence to actually be true or false. |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +### Possible worlds |
| 22 | +For each way the world *could have been*, there is a distinct possible world. |
| 23 | +Only talk about *logically* possible ways that would have turned out. |
| 24 | +Ex. $2 + 2 \neq 5$ (I was thinking this maybe could be true in a quaternary system, but then I realized 5 isn't even a defined digit under that. There is only $2_4 + 2_4 = 10_4$) |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +### Connectives |
| 27 | +- negation *not* reverses the truth. |
| 28 | +- logical connectives *and* require both conjuncts to be true. |
| 29 | +- logical connectives *or* require one of the two conjuncts to be true. |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +## Composing meanings |
| 32 | +### Establishing truth conditions |
| 33 | +Meaning of a sentence is its truth conditions. |
| 34 | +- Determining the meaning of a sentence by the meanings of the words it contains and the way they are combined. This is called the **principle of compositionality**. |
| 35 | +- There is an order of operations establishing the conditions. |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +(The reason I think that there's the logical aspect, because the word in languages doesn't have a connection to it's meaning. So there is the need of building the logic constructively from ground up, not using established languages) |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +### Common semantic building blocks |
| 40 | +- Names (proper nouns) refer to specific individuals in the world (**referent**) |
| 41 | +- Common nouns refer to the *collection* of individuals in the world. |
| 42 | +- Verb phrases that combine with a subject noun to form a sentence are called **predicates**. |
| 43 | + - Under what conditions it applies to any given individual. |
| 44 | + - What the world must be like for it to apply to any given individual. |
| 45 | + - In what kinds of logically possible situations it would be possible. |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +### Set theory |
| 48 | +Venn diagrams to model the set of individuals. |
| 49 | +**Inclusive** and **Exclusive or**. |
| 50 | +but is logically equivalent to and, but it conveys an extra meaning of unexpectedness or contrast. |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +### Quantifiers |
| 53 | +To relate predicates to other predicates, examples: |
| 54 | +- every (subset) |
| 55 | +- some (non-empty intersection) |
| 56 | +- no (no intersection) |
| 57 | +- numerals (exact quantity of the shared elements) |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +## Entailment |
| 60 | +- When one sentence follows from another. |
| 61 | + - (Implication that are one/two directional) |
| 62 | + - A formal definition of being **synonymous** (iff). |
| 63 | +- When sentences are contradictory. |
| 64 | + - a formal definition of being **contradictions** |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +Relation of entailment is given just by the meaning of a sentence, independent of context. However, in actual conversation speakers often rely on context when communicating. More related to pragmatics. |
0 commit comments