Skip to content

Commit c34c9de

Browse files
committed
feat: add article on Test Driven Agentic Workflows
1 parent e399781 commit c34c9de

1 file changed

Lines changed: 30 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

  • www/links/2026/02/03/where-are-the-test-driven-agentic-workflows-anyway
Lines changed: 30 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
1+
---
2+
tags:
3+
- article
4+
- link
5+
author: eric
6+
title: Where Are the Test Driven Agentic Workflows, Anyway?
7+
date: 2026-02-03 16:56:10 -07:00
8+
linkUrl: https://blog.fsck.com/2026/02/03/managing-agents/
9+
---
10+
11+
[Jesse Vincent][link]:
12+
13+
> By my very uncharitable math, agentic software engineering methodologies have gotten to
14+
> somewhere around the 1970s. Like everything in AI, this is, of course, a speed run. We’re
15+
> very quickly relearning why software engineering management and software engineering
16+
> project management matter.
17+
>
18+
> So by next Tuesday, maybe folks will start thinking about what they can steal from XP.
19+
20+
I’ve been thinking that we’re probably not that far away from seeing a decent boost in
21+
quality from coding agents that implement a Test Driven Development workflow.
22+
23+
Based on my experience, it’s not really possible to get a coding agent to follow TDD on its
24+
own by instructing it to. Even with the rules of TDD spelled out in an `AGENTS.md` or
25+
similar, I’ve found that they will write tests simultaneously with the production code. They
26+
don’t bother ensuring they see a test fail for the expected reason. I don’t know if that is
27+
because the models themselves have trouble following the instructions, or if the agent’s
28+
system prompts are interfering.
29+
30+
I honestly wouldn’t be surprised if next Tuesday Claude Code _does_ ship a TDD mode.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)