Skip to content

Commit dedc0d7

Browse files
authored
style: fix more bad indents (#420)
1 parent b1465e7 commit dedc0d7

1 file changed

Lines changed: 38 additions & 38 deletions

File tree

CslibTests/FreeMonad.lean

Lines changed: 38 additions & 38 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -283,8 +283,8 @@ This captures the expected error propagation behavior in effectful computations.
283283
theorem runEff_bind_err {α β}
284284
{p : FreeM Eff α} {k : α → FreeM Eff β}
285285
{env : Env} {tr : Trace} {msg : String} :
286-
runEff p env tr = .error msg →
287-
runEff (p >>= k) env tr = .error msg := by
286+
runEff p env tr = .error msg →
287+
runEff (p >>= k) env tr = .error msg := by
288288
induction p generalizing env tr msg <;> simp only [runEff, bind, foldFreeM] <;> intro h
289289
· case pure => simp [effPure] at h
290290
· case liftBind _ op _ ih =>
@@ -307,41 +307,41 @@ theorem runEff_eval_correct (e : Expr) (env : Env) (trace : Trace)
307307
(res : Except String (Int × Env × Trace))
308308
(h : EvalRel e env trace res) :
309309
runEff (eval e) env trace = res := by
310-
induction h
311-
· case val z env trace =>
312-
simp [eval, pure_eq_pure, runEff, effPure]
313-
· case var_found x env trace v h =>
314-
simp [runEff, eval, getEnv, lift_def, effStep, h, effPure]
315-
· case var_missing x env trace h =>
316-
simp [runEff, eval, bind, getEnv, fail, lift_def, effStep, h]
317-
· case add e₁ e₂ env trace₁ trace₂ trace₃ v1 v2 env₂ env₃ h₁ h₂ ih₁ ih₂ =>
318-
simp [eval, bind]
319-
have step₁ := runEff_bind_ok (p := eval e₁ ) (k := fun v1 => do
320-
let v2 ← eval e₂
321-
pure (v1 + v2)) ih₁
322-
simp [bind] at step₁; simp [step₁]
323-
have step₂ := runEff_bind_ok (p := eval e₂) (k := fun v2 => pure (v1 + v2)) ih₂
324-
simp [bind] at step₂; simp [step₂]; rfl
325-
· case div_ok e₁ e₂ env trace₁ trace₂ trace₃ v₁ v₂ env₂ env₃ v₂_ne_0 h₁ h₂ ih₁ ih₂ =>
326-
simp [eval, bind]
327-
have step₁ := runEff_bind_ok (p := eval e₁) (k := fun v1 => do
328-
let v2 ← eval e₂
329-
if v2 = 0 then do fail "divide by zero"; pure 0 else pure (v1 / v2)) ih₁
330-
simp [bind] at step₁; simp [step₁]
331-
have step₂ := runEff_bind_ok (p := eval e₂) (k := fun v₂ =>
332-
if v₂ = 0 then do fail "divide by zero"; pure 0 else pure (v₁ / v₂)) ih₂
333-
simp [bind] at step₂; simp [step₂, v₂_ne_0]
334-
rfl
335-
· case div_zero e₁ e₂ env' trace₁ trace₂ trace₃ v₁ v₂ env₂ env₃ v₂_eq_0 h₁ h₂ ih₁ ih₂ =>
336-
simp [eval, bind]
337-
have step₁ := runEff_bind_ok (p := eval e₁) (k := fun v₁ => do
338-
let v₂ ← eval e₂
339-
if v₂ = 0 then fail "divide by zero"; pure 0 else pure (v₁ / v₂)) ih₁
340-
simp [bind] at step₁; simp [step₁]
341-
have step₂ := runEff_bind_ok (p := eval e₂) (k := fun v₂ =>
342-
if v₂ = 0 then (do fail "divide by zero"; pure 0) else pure (v₁ / v₂)) ih₂
343-
simp [bind] at step₂; simp [step₂, v₂_eq_0]
344-
simp [fail, lift, runEff]
345-
rfl
310+
induction h
311+
· case val z env trace =>
312+
simp [eval, pure_eq_pure, runEff, effPure]
313+
· case var_found x env trace v h =>
314+
simp [runEff, eval, getEnv, lift_def, effStep, h, effPure]
315+
· case var_missing x env trace h =>
316+
simp [runEff, eval, bind, getEnv, fail, lift_def, effStep, h]
317+
· case add e₁ e₂ env trace₁ trace₂ trace₃ v1 v2 env₂ env₃ h₁ h₂ ih₁ ih₂ =>
318+
simp [eval, bind]
319+
have step₁ := runEff_bind_ok (p := eval e₁ ) (k := fun v1 => do
320+
let v2 ← eval e₂
321+
pure (v1 + v2)) ih₁
322+
simp [bind] at step₁; simp [step₁]
323+
have step₂ := runEff_bind_ok (p := eval e₂) (k := fun v2 => pure (v1 + v2)) ih₂
324+
simp [bind] at step₂; simp [step₂]; rfl
325+
· case div_ok e₁ e₂ env trace₁ trace₂ trace₃ v₁ v₂ env₂ env₃ v₂_ne_0 h₁ h₂ ih₁ ih₂ =>
326+
simp [eval, bind]
327+
have step₁ := runEff_bind_ok (p := eval e₁) (k := fun v1 => do
328+
let v2 ← eval e₂
329+
if v2 = 0 then do fail "divide by zero"; pure 0 else pure (v1 / v2)) ih₁
330+
simp [bind] at step₁; simp [step₁]
331+
have step₂ := runEff_bind_ok (p := eval e₂) (k := fun v₂ =>
332+
if v₂ = 0 then do fail "divide by zero"; pure 0 else pure (v₁ / v₂)) ih₂
333+
simp [bind] at step₂; simp [step₂, v₂_ne_0]
334+
rfl
335+
· case div_zero e₁ e₂ env' trace₁ trace₂ trace₃ v₁ v₂ env₂ env₃ v₂_eq_0 h₁ h₂ ih₁ ih₂ =>
336+
simp [eval, bind]
337+
have step₁ := runEff_bind_ok (p := eval e₁) (k := fun v₁ => do
338+
let v₂ ← eval e₂
339+
if v₂ = 0 then fail "divide by zero"; pure 0 else pure (v₁ / v₂)) ih₁
340+
simp [bind] at step₁; simp [step₁]
341+
have step₂ := runEff_bind_ok (p := eval e₂) (k := fun v₂ =>
342+
if v₂ = 0 then (do fail "divide by zero"; pure 0) else pure (v₁ / v₂)) ih₂
343+
simp [bind] at step₂; simp [step₂, v₂_eq_0]
344+
simp [fail, lift, runEff]
345+
rfl
346346

347347
end CslibTests

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)