Conversation
and move to shuffle.rs
It is redundant information we already have access to with nam.anchors.len()
instead of a tuple
Collaborator
Author
|
I’ve added a couple of (refactoring) commits that I had in a different branch. These introduce a That is, instead of The idea is that |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since it’s a bit unclear whether we are going to merge PR #576/#584, I’ve extracted the first couple of commits from #584. These only do some refactoring that is I think an overall improvement and can be merged no matter what we decide on the main PRs.