Optimization run completed on: 2025-01-28 19:54:57
- Maximum Efficiency: 73.0%
- Average Efficiency: 73.0%
- Flow Rate Performance:
- 5.0 m/s: Final Error = 2.0528, No Improvement
- 7.5 m/s: Final Error = 0.0000, Convergence Achieved
- 10.0 m/s: Final Error = 0.0000, Convergence Achieved
- Maximum Efficiency: 73.0%
- Average Efficiency: 73.0%
- Flow Rate Performance:
- 15.0 m/s: Final Error = 0.0000, Convergence Achieved
- 20.0 m/s: Final Error = 0.0000, Convergence Achieved
- 25.0 m/s: Final Error = 0.0000, Convergence Achieved
- Maximum Efficiency: 73.0%
- Average Efficiency: 71.8%
- Flow Rate Performance:
- 30.0 m/s: Final Error = 0.0000, Convergence Achieved
- 35.0 m/s: Final Error = 0.0000, Efficiency Drop to 51.3%
- 40.0 m/s: Final Error = 0.0000, Recovery to 73.0%
-
Optimal Performance Range:
- Best performance achieved in medium flow rate range
- Consistent efficiency around 73% for most operating points
- Perfect convergence (zero error) achieved for most test cases
-
Performance Limitations:
- Efficiency drop observed at 35.0 m/s
- Minor convergence issues at very low flow rates (5.0 m/s)
-
Optimization Success:
- 8 out of 9 test points achieved perfect convergence
- Maintained high efficiency across wide operating range
- Successfully adapted parameters for different flow conditions
-
Optimal Operating Range:
- Recommended: 15.0 - 30.0 m/s
- Most stable and efficient performance
-
Design Considerations:
- Avoid operation at 35.0 m/s due to efficiency drop
- Consider additional optimization for very low flow rates
-
Future Improvements:
- Focus on improving low flow rate performance
- Investigate efficiency drop at 35.0 m/s
- Consider additional parameter tuning for extreme operating points
Complete results and optimization history can be found in:
results/comprehensive_results_20250128_195457.json