Skip to content

A small fix #2

@itchyshin

Description

@itchyshin

https://github.com/itchyshin/Meta-analysis_tutorial/blob/main/R/meta-analysis_tutorial_latest.Rmd

Please fix below - XX% @Yefeng0920

#Line 1836
According to our survey, only a few (XX%) environmental meta-analyses used multilevel model. Therefore, environmental meta-analysts may be not familiar with 'random effects'? Many researchers have attempted to define it ( [see Andrew Gelman's nice summary](https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2005/01/25/why_i_dont_use/) ).  Here, we give an intuitive explanation in the context of a environmental meta-analysis: 

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions