Skip to content

Configuring ISCE TOPS stack for small bridge-scale AOI and asc/desc monitoring (Sentinel-1 IW) #1002

@emanueliwanow

Description

@emanueliwanow

Hi,

I'm working on a long-term InSAR monitoring project for civil assets, mainly bridges (typical length ~500 m), using Sentinel-1 IW data. My processing chain is:

  • ISCE: SLC processing / co-registration / interferogram generation (TOPS) (using stackSentinel.py)
  • Miaplpy: stack loading + phase linking only
  • SARvey: LOS time-series and velocity estimation
  • Custom scripts: combine ascending + descending LOS into vertical and horizontal components, and compute Hotelling T² control charts from the resulting time-series.

I'm not fully satisfied with the quality and stability of the LOS time-series over my bridges, and I suspect part of the problem is how I set up the ISCE stack for such a small AOI. I would appreciate some guidance on best practices.

Context

  • Sensor: Sentinel-1 IW, both ascending and descending tracks
  • AOI: very small polygon around an individual bridge

Ultimately, I want consistent geometry and a clean, stable LOS stack (asc + desc) that I can use for vertical/horizontal decomposition and statistical monitoring.

Questions

  1. Consistency across the stack (and between asc/desc)

    For bridge monitoring and asc/desc decomposition, I want very consistent geometry over time:

    • Same bursts and subswaths for all dates within a track
    • Good consistency between ascending and descending stacks

    Are there recommended parameters/settings to:

    • Avoid subtle geometric differences that might affect phase linking and later asc/desc combination?
  2. Pointers to examples

    If there are example scripts, configs, or publications that show an ISCE setup for:

    • localized infrastructure (bridges, dams, etc.), or
    • very small AOIs in Sentinel-1 IW, especially when using both asc and desc,

    I would be very grateful for links or references.

I’m happy to provide:

  • A sample configuration file,
  • One or two SAFE products,
  • And log excerpts if that helps.

Thanks a lot for any guidance or best-practice advice you can share.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions