Hi there,
currently the dev-server does not fully support to have a jsonConfig.json[5] and a React tab in parallel. At least the hot reload feature is a either/or decision. You can see that here:

Might be connected to #464
Maybe there are more parts like this. But before I dive into that any more: Is this intendend behaviour? Like is there a fixed guideline for adapter development out there that says: Either use HTML/React for config, tab and custom or use jsonConfig for config (no tab/custom) and do not combine approaches?
I personally really like to use a React tab and jsonConfig for the simpler config part. But if this is not the way to go then I might switch because the missing hot reload feature is a killer for itself. Other downsides I haven't recognized so far but they may exist.
Thanks for feedback in advance!
Hi there,
currently the dev-server does not fully support to have a jsonConfig.json[5] and a React tab in parallel. At least the hot reload feature is a either/or decision. You can see that here:
dev-server/src/index.ts
Line 638 in 259a1cc
Might be connected to #464
Maybe there are more parts like this. But before I dive into that any more: Is this intendend behaviour? Like is there a fixed guideline for adapter development out there that says: Either use HTML/React for config, tab and custom or use jsonConfig for config (no tab/custom) and do not combine approaches?
I personally really like to use a React tab and jsonConfig for the simpler config part. But if this is not the way to go then I might switch because the missing hot reload feature is a killer for itself. Other downsides I haven't recognized so far but they may exist.
Thanks for feedback in advance!