|
| 1 | +/* |
| 2 | + * Copyright (c) 2016-present Invertase Limited & Contributors |
| 3 | + * |
| 4 | + * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); |
| 5 | + * you may not use this library except in compliance with the License. |
| 6 | + * You may obtain a copy of the License at |
| 7 | + * |
| 8 | + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 |
| 9 | + * |
| 10 | + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software |
| 11 | + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, |
| 12 | + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. |
| 13 | + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and |
| 14 | + * limitations under the License. |
| 15 | + * |
| 16 | + */ |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +import { jest, describe, it, expect, beforeEach, afterEach } from '@jest/globals'; |
| 19 | +import { PasswordPolicyImpl } from '../lib/password-policy/PasswordPolicyImpl.js'; |
| 20 | +import { PasswordPolicyMixin } from '../lib/password-policy/PasswordPolicyMixin.js'; |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +const mockPasswordPolicy = { |
| 23 | + schemaVersion: 1, |
| 24 | + customStrengthOptions: { |
| 25 | + minPasswordLength: 8, |
| 26 | + maxPasswordLength: 100, |
| 27 | + containsLowercaseCharacter: true, |
| 28 | + containsUppercaseCharacter: true, |
| 29 | + containsNumericCharacter: true, |
| 30 | + containsNonAlphanumericCharacter: true, |
| 31 | + }, |
| 32 | + allowedNonAlphanumericCharacters: ['!', '@', '#', '$', '%'], |
| 33 | + enforcementState: 'ENFORCE', |
| 34 | +}; |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +describe('PasswordPolicyMixin', () => { |
| 37 | + describe('_getPasswordPolicyInternal', () => { |
| 38 | + it('should return project policy when tenantId is null', () => { |
| 39 | + const projectPolicy = new PasswordPolicyImpl(mockPasswordPolicy); |
| 40 | + const auth = { |
| 41 | + _tenantId: null, |
| 42 | + _projectPasswordPolicy: projectPolicy, |
| 43 | + _tenantPasswordPolicies: {}, |
| 44 | + }; |
| 45 | + Object.assign(auth, { |
| 46 | + _getPasswordPolicyInternal: PasswordPolicyMixin._getPasswordPolicyInternal, |
| 47 | + }); |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | + const result = auth._getPasswordPolicyInternal(); |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | + expect(result).toBe(projectPolicy); |
| 52 | + }); |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | + it('should return tenant policy when tenantId is set', () => { |
| 55 | + const tenantPolicy = new PasswordPolicyImpl(mockPasswordPolicy); |
| 56 | + const auth = { |
| 57 | + _tenantId: 'tenant-1', |
| 58 | + _projectPasswordPolicy: null, |
| 59 | + _tenantPasswordPolicies: { 'tenant-1': tenantPolicy }, |
| 60 | + }; |
| 61 | + Object.assign(auth, { |
| 62 | + _getPasswordPolicyInternal: PasswordPolicyMixin._getPasswordPolicyInternal, |
| 63 | + }); |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | + const result = auth._getPasswordPolicyInternal(); |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | + expect(result).toBe(tenantPolicy); |
| 68 | + }); |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | + it('should return undefined when no policy is cached', () => { |
| 71 | + const auth = { |
| 72 | + _tenantId: null, |
| 73 | + _projectPasswordPolicy: null, |
| 74 | + _tenantPasswordPolicies: {}, |
| 75 | + }; |
| 76 | + Object.assign(auth, { |
| 77 | + _getPasswordPolicyInternal: PasswordPolicyMixin._getPasswordPolicyInternal, |
| 78 | + }); |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | + const result = auth._getPasswordPolicyInternal(); |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | + expect(result).toBeNull(); |
| 83 | + }); |
| 84 | + }); |
| 85 | +}); |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | +describe('validatePassword (integration)', () => { |
| 88 | + let mockAuth; |
| 89 | + let mockFetchPasswordPolicy; |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | + beforeEach(() => { |
| 92 | + mockFetchPasswordPolicy = jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(mockPasswordPolicy); |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | + // Create mock auth with the mixin, but override _updatePasswordPolicy to use our mock |
| 95 | + mockAuth = { |
| 96 | + app: { |
| 97 | + name: '[DEFAULT]', |
| 98 | + options: { apiKey: 'test-api-key-default' }, |
| 99 | + }, |
| 100 | + _tenantId: null, |
| 101 | + _projectPasswordPolicy: null, |
| 102 | + _tenantPasswordPolicies: {}, |
| 103 | + }; |
| 104 | + |
| 105 | + // Apply the real mixin methods |
| 106 | + Object.assign(mockAuth, { |
| 107 | + _getPasswordPolicyInternal: PasswordPolicyMixin._getPasswordPolicyInternal, |
| 108 | + _recachePasswordPolicy: PasswordPolicyMixin._recachePasswordPolicy, |
| 109 | + validatePassword: PasswordPolicyMixin.validatePassword, |
| 110 | + }); |
| 111 | + |
| 112 | + // Override _updatePasswordPolicy to use our mock fetch |
| 113 | + mockAuth._updatePasswordPolicy = async function () { |
| 114 | + const response = await mockFetchPasswordPolicy(this); |
| 115 | + const passwordPolicy = new PasswordPolicyImpl(response); |
| 116 | + if (this._tenantId === null) { |
| 117 | + this._projectPasswordPolicy = passwordPolicy; |
| 118 | + } else { |
| 119 | + this._tenantPasswordPolicies[this._tenantId] = passwordPolicy; |
| 120 | + } |
| 121 | + }; |
| 122 | + }); |
| 123 | + |
| 124 | + afterEach(() => { |
| 125 | + jest.clearAllMocks(); |
| 126 | + }); |
| 127 | + |
| 128 | + describe('caching behavior', () => { |
| 129 | + it('should fetch password policy on first call', async () => { |
| 130 | + await mockAuth.validatePassword('Password123$'); |
| 131 | + |
| 132 | + expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
| 133 | + expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(mockAuth); |
| 134 | + }); |
| 135 | + |
| 136 | + it('should use cached policy on subsequent calls for same auth instance', async () => { |
| 137 | + await mockAuth.validatePassword('Password123$'); |
| 138 | + expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
| 139 | + |
| 140 | + await mockAuth.validatePassword('AnotherPassword1!'); |
| 141 | + expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
| 142 | + |
| 143 | + await mockAuth.validatePassword('YetAnother1@'); |
| 144 | + expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
| 145 | + }); |
| 146 | + |
| 147 | + it('should cache at project level when tenantId is null', async () => { |
| 148 | + await mockAuth.validatePassword('Password123$'); |
| 149 | + |
| 150 | + expect(mockAuth._projectPasswordPolicy).not.toBeNull(); |
| 151 | + expect(Object.keys(mockAuth._tenantPasswordPolicies).length).toBe(0); |
| 152 | + }); |
| 153 | + |
| 154 | + it('should cache separately per tenant', async () => { |
| 155 | + // First tenant |
| 156 | + mockAuth._tenantId = 'tenant-1'; |
| 157 | + await mockAuth.validatePassword('Password123$'); |
| 158 | + expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
| 159 | + |
| 160 | + // Same tenant should use cache |
| 161 | + await mockAuth.validatePassword('AnotherPassword1!'); |
| 162 | + expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
| 163 | + |
| 164 | + // Different tenant should fetch again |
| 165 | + mockAuth._tenantId = 'tenant-2'; |
| 166 | + await mockAuth.validatePassword('Password123$'); |
| 167 | + expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2); |
| 168 | + |
| 169 | + // Back to first tenant should use its cache |
| 170 | + mockAuth._tenantId = 'tenant-1'; |
| 171 | + await mockAuth.validatePassword('Password123$'); |
| 172 | + expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2); |
| 173 | + |
| 174 | + // Verify both tenant policies are cached |
| 175 | + expect(mockAuth._tenantPasswordPolicies['tenant-1']).toBeDefined(); |
| 176 | + expect(mockAuth._tenantPasswordPolicies['tenant-2']).toBeDefined(); |
| 177 | + }); |
| 178 | + |
| 179 | + it('should keep project and tenant caches separate', async () => { |
| 180 | + // Project level (no tenant) |
| 181 | + await mockAuth.validatePassword('Password123$'); |
| 182 | + expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
| 183 | + |
| 184 | + // Tenant level |
| 185 | + mockAuth._tenantId = 'tenant-1'; |
| 186 | + await mockAuth.validatePassword('Password123$'); |
| 187 | + expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2); |
| 188 | + |
| 189 | + // Back to project level should use project cache |
| 190 | + mockAuth._tenantId = null; |
| 191 | + await mockAuth.validatePassword('Password123$'); |
| 192 | + expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2); |
| 193 | + |
| 194 | + // Verify both caches exist |
| 195 | + expect(mockAuth._projectPasswordPolicy).not.toBeNull(); |
| 196 | + expect(mockAuth._tenantPasswordPolicies['tenant-1']).toBeDefined(); |
| 197 | + }); |
| 198 | + |
| 199 | + it('should return correct validation status using cached policy', async () => { |
| 200 | + const status1 = await mockAuth.validatePassword('Password123$'); |
| 201 | + expect(status1.isValid).toBe(true); |
| 202 | + |
| 203 | + const status2 = await mockAuth.validatePassword('weak'); |
| 204 | + expect(status2.isValid).toBe(false); |
| 205 | + |
| 206 | + expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
| 207 | + }); |
| 208 | + }); |
| 209 | + |
| 210 | + describe('schema validation', () => { |
| 211 | + it('should throw error on unsupported schema version', async () => { |
| 212 | + const unsupportedPolicy = { |
| 213 | + ...mockPasswordPolicy, |
| 214 | + schemaVersion: 2, |
| 215 | + }; |
| 216 | + mockFetchPasswordPolicy.mockResolvedValueOnce(unsupportedPolicy); |
| 217 | + |
| 218 | + await expect(mockAuth.validatePassword('Password123$')).rejects.toThrow( |
| 219 | + 'auth/unsupported-password-policy-schema-version', |
| 220 | + ); |
| 221 | + }); |
| 222 | + |
| 223 | + it('should accept schema version 1', async () => { |
| 224 | + const validPolicy = { |
| 225 | + ...mockPasswordPolicy, |
| 226 | + schemaVersion: 1, |
| 227 | + }; |
| 228 | + mockFetchPasswordPolicy.mockResolvedValueOnce(validPolicy); |
| 229 | + |
| 230 | + const status = await mockAuth.validatePassword('Password123$'); |
| 231 | + expect(status.isValid).toBe(true); |
| 232 | + }); |
| 233 | + }); |
| 234 | + |
| 235 | + describe('cache invalidation', () => { |
| 236 | + it('should refresh cache when _recachePasswordPolicy is called with existing cache', async () => { |
| 237 | + // First call caches the policy |
| 238 | + await mockAuth.validatePassword('Password123$'); |
| 239 | + expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
| 240 | + |
| 241 | + // Simulate cache invalidation |
| 242 | + await mockAuth._recachePasswordPolicy(); |
| 243 | + expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2); |
| 244 | + }); |
| 245 | + |
| 246 | + it('should not fetch when _recachePasswordPolicy is called without existing cache', async () => { |
| 247 | + // No prior validation, so no cache exists |
| 248 | + await mockAuth._recachePasswordPolicy(); |
| 249 | + expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(0); |
| 250 | + }); |
| 251 | + |
| 252 | + it('should refresh correct tenant cache on invalidation', async () => { |
| 253 | + // Cache for tenant-1 |
| 254 | + mockAuth._tenantId = 'tenant-1'; |
| 255 | + await mockAuth.validatePassword('Password123$'); |
| 256 | + |
| 257 | + // Cache for tenant-2 |
| 258 | + mockAuth._tenantId = 'tenant-2'; |
| 259 | + await mockAuth.validatePassword('Password123$'); |
| 260 | + |
| 261 | + expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2); |
| 262 | + |
| 263 | + // Invalidate tenant-1 cache |
| 264 | + mockAuth._tenantId = 'tenant-1'; |
| 265 | + await mockAuth._recachePasswordPolicy(); |
| 266 | + |
| 267 | + // Should have fetched again for tenant-1 |
| 268 | + expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(3); |
| 269 | + }); |
| 270 | + }); |
| 271 | +}); |
| 272 | + |
| 273 | +describe('validatePassword (modular API)', () => { |
| 274 | + let validatePassword; |
| 275 | + let mockAuth; |
| 276 | + |
| 277 | + beforeEach(async () => { |
| 278 | + const modular = await import('../lib/modular/index.js'); |
| 279 | + validatePassword = modular.validatePassword; |
| 280 | + |
| 281 | + mockAuth = { |
| 282 | + app: { name: '[DEFAULT]', options: { apiKey: 'test-api-key' } }, |
| 283 | + validatePassword: jest.fn(), |
| 284 | + }; |
| 285 | + }); |
| 286 | + |
| 287 | + it('should throw error for undefined auth', async () => { |
| 288 | + await expect(validatePassword(undefined, 'Password123$')).rejects.toThrow( |
| 289 | + "firebase.auth().validatePassword(*) 'auth' must be a valid Auth instance with an 'app' property", |
| 290 | + ); |
| 291 | + }); |
| 292 | + |
| 293 | + it('should throw error for auth without app property', async () => { |
| 294 | + await expect(validatePassword({}, 'Password123$')).rejects.toThrow( |
| 295 | + "firebase.auth().validatePassword(*) 'auth' must be a valid Auth instance with an 'app' property", |
| 296 | + ); |
| 297 | + }); |
| 298 | + |
| 299 | + it('should throw error for null password', async () => { |
| 300 | + await expect(validatePassword(mockAuth, null)).rejects.toThrow( |
| 301 | + "firebase.auth().validatePassword(*) expected 'password' to be a non-null or a defined value.", |
| 302 | + ); |
| 303 | + }); |
| 304 | + |
| 305 | + it('should throw error for undefined password', async () => { |
| 306 | + await expect(validatePassword(mockAuth, undefined)).rejects.toThrow( |
| 307 | + "firebase.auth().validatePassword(*) expected 'password' to be a non-null or a defined value.", |
| 308 | + ); |
| 309 | + }); |
| 310 | + |
| 311 | + it('should delegate to auth.validatePassword for valid password', async () => { |
| 312 | + mockAuth.validatePassword.mockResolvedValue({ isValid: true }); |
| 313 | + |
| 314 | + const result = await validatePassword(mockAuth, 'Password123$'); |
| 315 | + |
| 316 | + expect(mockAuth.validatePassword).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
| 317 | + 'Password123$', |
| 318 | + 'react-native-firebase-modular-method-call', |
| 319 | + ); |
| 320 | + expect(result).toEqual({ isValid: true }); |
| 321 | + }); |
| 322 | +}); |
0 commit comments