Articles scanned: 35 evergreen | Run date: 2026-03-13 | New since last audit: 2 articles
Items marked ⚠️ Persistent appeared in the 2026-03-11 audit and remain unresolved.
🔗 Link Health
Articles scanned: 35 | Internal links checked: 94 | Issues found: 1
Broken Internal Links
| Article |
Link Text |
Broken URL |
Correct URL |
agentic-ai-transforming-dev-teams |
"GitHub Copilot CLI worktrees" |
/articles/copilot-fleet-mode-video-pipeline |
/articles/video-pipeline-with-fleet-mode |
⚠️ Persistent — flagged in 2026-03-11 audit, not yet fixed. Located in ## The Circle Replaces the Hierarchy section, line 31.
Fix: In src/content/articles/agentic-ai-transforming-dev-teams.mdx, change:
[GitHub Copilot CLI worktrees](/articles/copilot-fleet-mode-video-pipeline)
```
to:
```
[GitHub Copilot CLI worktrees](/articles/video-pipeline-with-fleet-mode)
External Links
Unable to verify all 522 external links due to sandbox network restrictions. One URL returned a fetch error (possible timeout/blocking — not confirmed 404):
Note: Image paths using /articles/*.png in github-agentic-workflows-hands-on-guide and github-copilot-visual-studio-guide resolve to confirmed files in public/articles/ — not broken.
📊 Factual Freshness
Articles scanned: 35 | Stale references found: 5
⚠️ Persistent — all items below appeared in the 2026-03-11 audit.
Potentially Stale References
| Article |
What It Says |
Current Reality |
Severity |
Suggested Update |
ai-fixes-its-own-bugs |
"SWE-agent solves 12.47% of real-world bugs on the SWE-bench evaluation set" (from NeurIPS 2024 paper) |
Top models now solve 50%+ on SWE-bench verified subset; the field has moved dramatically since the NeurIPS 2024 baseline |
🔴 High |
Add context: "Since the NeurIPS 2024 paper, the field has advanced rapidly — top models on SWE-bench now exceed 50% resolution rates." The 12.47% is historically accurate but reads as the current state. |
ai-fixes-its-own-bugs |
"combines CodeQL's semantic analysis engine with GPT-4o" |
GitHub's 2024 blog post describes GPT-4o; the underlying model for CodeQL Autofix has likely been updated since Feb 2024 |
🔴 High |
Verify current model with GitHub's latest Autofix docs; update to "Copilot" or current model name if GPT-4o is no longer accurate. |
copilot-developer-fulfillment |
"With 20 million GitHub Copilot users..." |
GitHub surpassed 30M+ Copilot users by late 2025/early 2026 |
🟡 Medium |
Update to reflect current user count with a citation to GitHub's latest figures |
copilot-developer-fulfillment |
References "the 2024 DORA report" |
2025 DORA report is now available — note: stanford-study-ai-roi-in-engineering already references the 2025 version |
🟡 Medium |
Update citation to 2025 DORA report; the findings directionally align but the newer report includes AI-specific data |
choosing-the-right-ai-sdk |
Table shows GitHub Copilot SDK | Technical Preview (Jan 2026) |
~7 weeks have passed since the Technical Preview launch; GA status may have changed |
🟡 Medium |
Verify current SDK status at https://github.blog/changelog/ — update table row and any "preview" language if it has reached GA |
🔀 Cross-Linking Opportunities
New zero-inbound articles (published since last audit): 2 | Carryover zero-inbound: 8
🆕 NEW: stop-pulling-your-agentic-unicorns-off-the-field
File: src/content/articles/stop-pulling-your-agentic-unicorns-off-the-field.mdx
Published: 2026-03-12 | Inbound links: 0 | Related articles not linking to it:
-
Link from: stanford-study-ai-roi-in-engineering
- Suggested section:
## What Engineering Leaders Should Actually Do
- Insert after: "Teams that push through this curve compound their gains. Teams that don't fall further behind."
- Suggested text:
The compounding effect is exactly what I laid out in [why you shouldn't pull your agentic unicorns off the field](/articles/stop-pulling-your-agentic-unicorns-off-the-field) — that 5% of power users delivering 30%+ capacity expansion are precisely the engineers who pushed through the learning curve. Protect them.
-
Link from: agentic-ai-transforming-dev-teams
- Suggested section:
## The Circle Replaces the Hierarchy
- Insert near: "...tested against real user needs, and either validated or killed."
- Suggested text:
But to keep that loop spinning, you have to resist the temptation to pull your best agentic contributors off the field to run training sessions. I wrote about [why that's the most expensive resourcing mistake in engineering today](/articles/stop-pulling-your-agentic-unicorns-off-the-field).
-
Link from: turning-ai-skeptics-into-believers
- Suggested section:
## The Bottom Line
- Insert at the end of the closing section
- Suggested text:
Once you've converted them, resist the urge to deploy your power users as trainers. I wrote about [keeping your agentic unicorns on the field](/articles/stop-pulling-your-agentic-unicorns-off-the-field) — the data on why that trade-off rarely pays off.
🆕 NEW: github-copilot-vs-the-world
File: src/content/articles/github-copilot-vs-the-world.mdx
Published: 2026-03-12 | Inbound links: 0 | Related articles not linking to it:
-
Link from: choosing-the-right-ai-sdk
- Suggested section: The GitHub Copilot SDK section (around line 41–43)
- Insert after: "I built my SRE agent, I went from zero to a working prototype with MCP server integration in two hours."
- Suggested text:
If you want the full competitive picture on why GitHub's platform approach is pulling ahead of standalone tools, I broke down [why the AI coding war is already over](/articles/github-copilot-vs-the-world) — and what that means for your SDK decision.
-
Link from: copilot-developer-fulfillment
- Suggested section:
## The Skeptic's Corner
- Insert near the skeptic objections section
- Suggested text:
For a deeper look at where Copilot stands relative to Cursor, Codeium, and the rest of the field right now, I laid that out in [my breakdown of the AI coding competitive landscape](/articles/github-copilot-vs-the-world).
⚠️ Persistent Carryover: vibe-testing-when-ai-agents-goodhart-your-test-suite
Published: 2026-03-08 | Inbound links: 0
-
Link from: tests-are-everything-agentic-ai
- Suggested section:
## The Testing Reality for Agentic Teams
- Insert after: "Once I understood this, building comprehensive test suites became way simpler. Not easier — simpler."
- Suggested text:
What I didn't fully appreciate then: AI agents can game that simplicity. I went deep on what happens when agents optimize for coverage metrics instead of correctness in [my vibe testing breakdown](/articles/vibe-testing-when-ai-agents-goodhart-your-test-suite) — Goodhart's Law with a test runner.
-
Link from: test-enforcement-architecture-ai-agents
- Suggested section: Intro / first section
- Suggested text:
The failure mode this architecture prevents is what I'm calling [vibe testing](/articles/vibe-testing-when-ai-agents-goodhart-your-test-suite) — when AI agents generate tests that inflate coverage metrics while verifying nothing. Read that first if you want the context for why structural enforcement matters.
🌿 Evergreen Maintenance
Refresh candidates found: 5 | All have updatedDate: none and are 21–28 days old.
⚠️ Persistent — all candidates below appeared in the 2026-03-11 audit and have not been updated.
| Article |
Published |
Topic Area |
Why Refresh? |
Priority |
context-engineering-key-to-ai-development |
2026-02-14 |
Context Engineering |
22 inbound links make this a pillar piece; MCP has evolved, new Copilot CLI context features released |
🔴 High |
ai-fixes-its-own-bugs |
2026-02-14 |
Autonomous Bug Fixing |
SWE-bench leaderboard moved dramatically; CodeQL Autofix model likely updated; needs factual refresh (see above) |
🔴 High |
choosing-the-right-ai-sdk |
2026-02-14 |
AI SDKs |
SDK landscape evolving fast; Copilot SDK preview status may have changed; OpenAI Agents SDK updates |
🟡 Medium |
building-the-future-with-ai |
2026-02-13 |
AI Development Overview |
9 inbound links; broad intro piece published earliest — should reference newer articles added since (stop-pulling, github-copilot-vs-the-world, vibe-testing, specs-equal-tests) |
🟡 Medium |
agentic-ai-transforming-dev-teams |
2026-02-20 |
Agentic Dev Teams |
Has a broken internal link (see Link Health above); 41% AI code stat sourced from LinkedIn post, not primary research |
🟡 Medium |
Detailed Refresh: context-engineering-key-to-ai-development
File: src/content/articles/context-engineering-key-to-ai-development.mdx
- What changed since publication: MCP (Model Context Protocol) ecosystem has grown significantly — more servers, broader IDE support. Copilot CLI added new context management features in its Jan 2026 changelog. Several new htek.dev articles reference this piece as a pillar but it doesn't reference them back.
- Suggested updates:
- Sources: Copilot CLI Jan 2026 changelog, [MCP official site]((modelcontextprotocol.io/redacted)
Detailed Refresh: ai-fixes-its-own-bugs
File: src/content/articles/ai-fixes-its-own-bugs.mdx
- What changed since publication: SWE-bench top scores moved from 12–14% (early 2024) to 50%+ verified (early 2026). The article's framing of 12.47% as a benchmark number now understates the state of the art by ~4×.
- Suggested updates:
- Add a callout box: "Since this article was published, SWE-bench verified scores have climbed to 50%+ — the 12.47% figure is the 2024 baseline, not the current ceiling."
- Verify and update CodeQL Autofix model reference (GPT-4o → current)
- Reference the 2025 SWE-bench leaderboard analysis paper already cited inline
Generated by Article Relevance Audit — Weekly Health Check · ◷
Articles scanned: 35 evergreen | Run date: 2026-03-13 | New since last audit: 2 articles
🔗 Link Health
Articles scanned: 35 | Internal links checked: 94 | Issues found: 1
Broken Internal Links
agentic-ai-transforming-dev-teams/articles/copilot-fleet-mode-video-pipeline/articles/video-pipeline-with-fleet-mode## The Circle Replaces the Hierarchysection, line 31.Fix: In
src/content/articles/agentic-ai-transforming-dev-teams.mdx, change:External Links
Unable to verify all 522 external links due to sandbox network restrictions. One URL returned a fetch error (possible timeout/blocking — not confirmed 404):
agent-harnesses-controlling-ai-agents-2026Note: Image paths using
/articles/*.pngingithub-agentic-workflows-hands-on-guideandgithub-copilot-visual-studio-guideresolve to confirmed files inpublic/articles/— not broken.📊 Factual Freshness
Articles scanned: 35 | Stale references found: 5
Potentially Stale References
ai-fixes-its-own-bugsai-fixes-its-own-bugscopilot-developer-fulfillmentcopilot-developer-fulfillmentstanford-study-ai-roi-in-engineeringalready references the 2025 versionchoosing-the-right-ai-sdkGitHub Copilot SDK | Technical Preview (Jan 2026)🔀 Cross-Linking Opportunities
New zero-inbound articles (published since last audit): 2 | Carryover zero-inbound: 8
🆕 NEW:
stop-pulling-your-agentic-unicorns-off-the-fieldFile:
src/content/articles/stop-pulling-your-agentic-unicorns-off-the-field.mdxPublished: 2026-03-12 | Inbound links: 0 | Related articles not linking to it:
Link from:
stanford-study-ai-roi-in-engineering## What Engineering Leaders Should Actually DoThe compounding effect is exactly what I laid out in [why you shouldn't pull your agentic unicorns off the field](/articles/stop-pulling-your-agentic-unicorns-off-the-field) — that 5% of power users delivering 30%+ capacity expansion are precisely the engineers who pushed through the learning curve. Protect them.Link from:
agentic-ai-transforming-dev-teams## The Circle Replaces the HierarchyBut to keep that loop spinning, you have to resist the temptation to pull your best agentic contributors off the field to run training sessions. I wrote about [why that's the most expensive resourcing mistake in engineering today](/articles/stop-pulling-your-agentic-unicorns-off-the-field).Link from:
turning-ai-skeptics-into-believers## The Bottom LineOnce you've converted them, resist the urge to deploy your power users as trainers. I wrote about [keeping your agentic unicorns on the field](/articles/stop-pulling-your-agentic-unicorns-off-the-field) — the data on why that trade-off rarely pays off.🆕 NEW:
github-copilot-vs-the-worldFile:
src/content/articles/github-copilot-vs-the-world.mdxPublished: 2026-03-12 | Inbound links: 0 | Related articles not linking to it:
Link from:
choosing-the-right-ai-sdkIf you want the full competitive picture on why GitHub's platform approach is pulling ahead of standalone tools, I broke down [why the AI coding war is already over](/articles/github-copilot-vs-the-world) — and what that means for your SDK decision.Link from:
copilot-developer-fulfillment## The Skeptic's CornerFor a deeper look at where Copilot stands relative to Cursor, Codeium, and the rest of the field right now, I laid that out in [my breakdown of the AI coding competitive landscape](/articles/github-copilot-vs-the-world).vibe-testing-when-ai-agents-goodhart-your-test-suitePublished: 2026-03-08 | Inbound links: 0
Link from:
tests-are-everything-agentic-ai## The Testing Reality for Agentic TeamsWhat I didn't fully appreciate then: AI agents can game that simplicity. I went deep on what happens when agents optimize for coverage metrics instead of correctness in [my vibe testing breakdown](/articles/vibe-testing-when-ai-agents-goodhart-your-test-suite) — Goodhart's Law with a test runner.Link from:
test-enforcement-architecture-ai-agentsThe failure mode this architecture prevents is what I'm calling [vibe testing](/articles/vibe-testing-when-ai-agents-goodhart-your-test-suite) — when AI agents generate tests that inflate coverage metrics while verifying nothing. Read that first if you want the context for why structural enforcement matters.🌿 Evergreen Maintenance
Refresh candidates found: 5 | All have
updatedDate: noneand are 21–28 days old.context-engineering-key-to-ai-developmentai-fixes-its-own-bugschoosing-the-right-ai-sdkbuilding-the-future-with-aiagentic-ai-transforming-dev-teamsDetailed Refresh:
context-engineering-key-to-ai-developmentFile:
src/content/articles/context-engineering-key-to-ai-development.mdxagent-hooks-controlling-ai-codebaseandvibe-testing-when-ai-agents-goodhart-your-test-suiteas applied examplesDetailed Refresh:
ai-fixes-its-own-bugsFile:
src/content/articles/ai-fixes-its-own-bugs.mdx