Skip to content

SPRINT-PLANNING.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
1129 lines (915 loc) · 28.6 KB

SPRINT-PLANNING.md

File metadata and controls

1129 lines (915 loc) · 28.6 KB

Sprint Planning - Claude Code Watchdog

Project Overview

Project Name: Claude Code Watchdog Duration: 4 weeks (4 sprints) Team Size: 1-2 developers Methodology: Agile with 1-week sprints

Sprint Structure

  • Sprint Duration: 1 week (5 working days)
  • Sprint Planning: Monday morning (1 hour)
  • Daily Standups: 15 minutes (async via logs acceptable)
  • Sprint Review: Friday afternoon (1 hour)
  • Sprint Retrospective: Friday afternoon (30 minutes)

Sprint 1: Core Watchdog Foundation

Dates: Week 1 Goal: Build the foundational watchdog process with basic monitoring capabilities Success Criteria: Watchdog can monitor a single Claude Code session and auto-continue on TODOs

Work Items

WI-1.1: Project Structure Setup

Priority: P0 (Critical) Estimated Effort: 2 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: None

Description: Create the complete directory structure and placeholder files for the project

Acceptance Criteria:

  • All directories created as per architecture
  • All PowerShell files created with function signatures
  • Module imports working
  • Basic script execution verified

Tasks:

  1. Create src/ directory with all subdirectories
  2. Create config/, docs/, tests/, examples/ directories
  3. Create all .ps1 files with function signatures
  4. Add module imports and dot-sourcing
  5. Verify structure with test import

WI-1.2: Windows MCP Integration Wrapper

Priority: P0 (Critical) Estimated Effort: 3 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: WI-1.1

Description: Create wrapper functions for Windows MCP tools (State, Click, Type, Key)

Acceptance Criteria:

  • State-Tool wrapper functional
  • Click-Tool wrapper functional
  • Type-Tool wrapper functional
  • Key-Tool wrapper functional
  • Error handling implemented
  • Unit tests passing

Tasks:

  1. Implement Invoke-WindowsMCPStateTool
  2. Implement Invoke-WindowsMCPClick
  3. Implement Invoke-WindowsMCPType
  4. Implement Invoke-WindowsMCPKey
  5. Add retry logic with exponential backoff
  6. Write unit tests for each function
  7. Test with live Claude Code session

WI-1.3: State Detection Engine

Priority: P0 (Critical) Estimated Effort: 4 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: WI-1.2

Description: Implement state detection logic to classify Claude Code session states

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Detects all 6 states correctly (InProgress, WaitingForInput, HasTodos, PhaseComplete, Error, Idle)
  • Parses TODOs with count and status
  • Detects errors and warnings
  • Calculates idle time accurately
  • Identifies reply field coordinates
  • 95%+ accuracy on test cases

Tasks:

  1. Implement Get-ClaudeCodeState main function
  2. Implement Get-SessionStatus classification logic
  3. Implement Get-TodosFromUI parser
  4. Implement Get-ErrorsFromUI parser
  5. Implement Test-ProcessingIndicator
  6. Create test fixtures with sample UI states
  7. Run validation tests

WI-1.4: Rule-Based Decision Engine

Priority: P0 (Critical) Estimated Effort: 3 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: WI-1.3

Description: Implement simple rule-based decision logic (no API yet)

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Returns correct action for each state
  • Reasoning is clear and actionable
  • Confidence scores appropriate
  • Handles edge cases gracefully
  • Decision logging implemented

Tasks:

  1. Implement Invoke-SimpleDecision function
  2. Create rule set for each state
  3. Add confidence calculation logic
  4. Implement decision history tracking
  5. Add unit tests for all decision paths
  6. Test with simulated states

WI-1.5: Command Execution Module

Priority: P0 (Critical) Estimated Effort: 4 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: WI-1.2

Description: Implement command sending to Claude Code with retry and verification

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Commands sent successfully to Claude Code
  • Retry logic works (3 attempts)
  • Verification detects send failures
  • Handles UI quirks (timing, focus)
  • Logs all command attempts

Tasks:

  1. Implement Send-ClaudeCodeCommand function
  2. Add reply field detection logic
  3. Implement click → type → enter sequence
  4. Add verification logic
  5. Implement retry with exponential backoff
  6. Add comprehensive error handling
  7. Test with live Claude Code session

WI-1.6: Project Registration System

Priority: P0 (Critical) Estimated Effort: 3 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: WI-1.1

Description: Build system to register and manage multiple projects

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Can register new projects
  • Validates project configurations
  • Creates necessary state files
  • Stores registry in ~/.claude-automation/
  • Can list registered projects
  • Can pause/resume projects

Tasks:

  1. Implement Register-Project function
  2. Implement Test-ProjectConfiguration validation
  3. Implement Initialize-ProjectState setup
  4. Create Get-RegisteredProjects function
  5. Create Update-ProjectState function
  6. Add JSON schema validation
  7. Test with sample project configs

WI-1.7: Main Watchdog Loop

Priority: P0 (Critical) Estimated Effort: 4 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: WI-1.3, WI-1.4, WI-1.5, WI-1.6

Description: Implement the core polling loop that orchestrates all components

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Loop runs continuously without crashing
  • Processes all active projects
  • Respects polling interval (2 min default)
  • Handles errors without stopping
  • Stops gracefully on Ctrl+C
  • Updates heartbeat regularly

Tasks:

  1. Implement Start-Watchdog main function
  2. Implement Process-Project function
  3. Add project iteration logic
  4. Implement graceful shutdown handler
  5. Add heartbeat tracking
  6. Implement error isolation per project
  7. Add console output with colors
  8. Test 2+ hour continuous run

WI-1.8: Logging Infrastructure

Priority: P1 (High) Estimated Effort: 2 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: WI-1.1

Description: Create comprehensive logging and notification system

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Logs to markdown files
  • Logs to console with colors
  • Decision log format correct
  • Windows toast notifications work
  • Log rotation implemented
  • Notification rate limiting works

Tasks:

  1. Implement Write-WatchdogLog function
  2. Implement Add-DecisionToLog function
  3. Implement Send-Notification function
  4. Add BurntToast integration
  5. Create log file rotation logic
  6. Add timestamp formatting
  7. Test notification delivery

WI-1.9: Installation Script

Priority: P1 (High) Estimated Effort: 2 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: WI-1.1

Description: Create installation wizard for easy setup

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Checks prerequisites
  • Creates directories
  • Installs required modules
  • Sets up scheduled task (optional)
  • Provides clear error messages
  • Runs on fresh Windows install

Tasks:

  1. Create Install-Watchdog.ps1 script
  2. Add prerequisite checks
  3. Add module installation logic
  4. Create directory structure
  5. Add scheduled task creation (optional)
  6. Add validation steps
  7. Test on clean Windows VM

WI-1.10: Integration Testing

Priority: P1 (High) Estimated Effort: 3 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: WI-1.7

Description: End-to-end testing with real Claude Code session

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Can monitor live session
  • Detects states correctly
  • Sends commands successfully
  • Auto-continues on TODOs
  • Logs all decisions
  • Runs for 2+ hours without issues

Tasks:

  1. Create test project with config
  2. Register test project
  3. Start Claude Code session
  4. Start watchdog
  5. Monitor for 2+ hours
  6. Verify all states detected
  7. Verify all commands sent
  8. Review logs for accuracy
  9. Document any issues
  10. Fix critical bugs

Sprint 1 Metrics

Total Story Points: 30 Total Estimated Hours: 30 Key Deliverables:

  • Working watchdog process
  • Basic state detection
  • Rule-based decisions
  • Auto-continue functionality
  • Project registration
  • Logging system

Sprint 2: Intelligent Decision Making

Dates: Week 2 Goal: Add Claude API integration, skill-based error resolution, and cost management Success Criteria: Watchdog uses AI to make smart decisions and can invoke skills for errors

Work Items

WI-2.1: Claude API Integration

Priority: P0 (Critical) Estimated Effort: 4 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: Sprint 1 Complete

Description: Integrate Anthropic Claude API for intelligent decision-making

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Can call Claude API successfully
  • API key stored securely (Windows Credential Manager)
  • Error handling for API failures
  • Retries on transient failures
  • Token usage tracked
  • Response parsed correctly

Tasks:

  1. Implement Invoke-AnthropicAPI function
  2. Implement Set-WatchdogAPIKey for secure storage
  3. Implement Get-SecureAPIKey retrieval
  4. Add request/response logging
  5. Add retry logic with backoff
  6. Test with various prompts
  7. Validate JSON response parsing

WI-2.2: Advanced Decision Engine

Priority: P0 (Critical) Estimated Effort: 5 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: WI-2.1

Description: Build decision engine that uses Claude API with comprehensive context

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Builds detailed decision prompts
  • Includes project config in context
  • Includes decision history
  • Parses API responses to JSON
  • Falls back to rules if API fails
  • Confidence scores reflect API confidence

Tasks:

  1. Implement Invoke-ClaudeAPIDecision function
  2. Implement Build-DecisionPrompt function
  3. Add context aggregation logic
  4. Add response validation
  5. Implement fallback to rule-based
  6. Add decision comparison logging
  7. Test with various scenarios

WI-2.3: Skill-Based Error Resolution

Priority: P0 (Critical) Estimated Effort: 4 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: WI-2.2

Description: Enable watchdog to invoke Claude Skills for error resolution

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Detects errors that match skills
  • Constructs skill invocation commands
  • Sends skill commands to Claude Code
  • Tracks skill usage
  • Logs skill results
  • Handles skill failures

Tasks:

  1. Implement Find-SkillForError function
  2. Create error-to-skill mapping logic
  3. Implement skill command generation
  4. Add skill invocation tracking
  5. Test with sample skills
  6. Document skill integration patterns

WI-2.4: Cost Tracking System

Priority: P0 (Critical) Estimated Effort: 3 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: WI-2.1

Description: Track API costs and enforce budget limits

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Tracks token usage per call
  • Calculates costs based on pricing
  • Aggregates costs per project
  • Warns at 80% of daily limit
  • Stops API calls at 100% of limit
  • Generates cost reports

Tasks:

  1. Implement Update-APICosts function
  2. Implement Get-APICosts function
  3. Implement Calculate-APICost function
  4. Add cost threshold checks
  5. Add warning/limit enforcement
  6. Create cost report generator
  7. Test with simulated usage

WI-2.5: Enhanced State Detection

Priority: P1 (High) Estimated Effort: 3 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: Sprint 1 WI-1.3

Description: Improve state detection accuracy and add more states

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Detects compilation errors specifically
  • Detects test failures specifically
  • Identifies skill invocations
  • Parses error severity levels
  • Handles multi-line errors
  • 98%+ accuracy

Tasks:

  1. Add compilation error detection
  2. Add test failure detection
  3. Improve error severity classification
  4. Add multi-line error parsing
  5. Create additional test fixtures
  6. Validate accuracy improvements

WI-2.6: Decision Log Enhancements

Priority: P1 (High) Estimated Effort: 2 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: WI-2.2

Description: Enhance decision logs with API metadata and richer context

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Logs include API tokens used
  • Logs include estimated cost
  • Logs include confidence scores
  • Logs include skill invocations
  • Logs formatted as markdown
  • Logs easily readable

Tasks:

  1. Update Add-DecisionToLog function
  2. Add API metadata fields
  3. Add skill invocation details
  4. Improve markdown formatting
  5. Add decision comparison (API vs Rules)
  6. Test log readability

WI-2.7: API Configuration Management

Priority: P2 (Medium) Estimated Effort: 2 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: WI-2.1

Description: Create configuration system for API settings

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Configurable model selection
  • Configurable max tokens
  • Configurable temperature
  • Configurable cost limits
  • Settings persist across restarts
  • Validation on config changes

Tasks:

  1. Add API settings to global config
  2. Implement Set-APISettings function
  3. Implement Get-APISettings function
  4. Add validation for settings
  5. Test configuration persistence

WI-2.8: Integration Testing

Priority: P1 (High) Estimated Effort: 3 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: WI-2.2, WI-2.3, WI-2.4

Description: Test AI-powered decision making end-to-end

Acceptance Criteria:

  • API decisions more accurate than rules
  • Skills invoked correctly
  • Costs tracked accurately
  • System stays under budget
  • Fallback to rules works
  • 4+ hour continuous operation

Tasks:

  1. Set up test project with API enabled
  2. Create scenarios for testing
  3. Monitor decision quality
  4. Verify skill invocations
  5. Check cost calculations
  6. Test fallback scenarios
  7. Document findings

Sprint 2 Metrics

Total Story Points: 26 Total Estimated Hours: 26 Key Deliverables:

  • Claude API integration
  • AI-powered decisions
  • Skill-based error resolution
  • Cost tracking and limits
  • Enhanced decision logging

Sprint 3: Multi-Project & Git Operations

Dates: Week 3 Goal: Enable concurrent project monitoring and automated Git operations Success Criteria: Watchdog manages 3+ projects simultaneously with automatic commits and PRs

Work Items

WI-3.1: Multi-Project Session Detection

Priority: P0 (Critical) Estimated Effort: 4 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: Sprint 2 Complete

Description: Enable watchdog to identify and track multiple Claude Code sessions

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Detects all open Claude Code tabs
  • Maps sessions to registered projects
  • Handles projects without active sessions
  • Distinguishes between different projects
  • Updates session mapping dynamically

Tasks:

  1. Implement Find-ClaudeCodeSession function
  2. Add window title parsing
  3. Add URL-based project identification
  4. Create session-to-project mapping
  5. Handle multiple browser windows
  6. Test with 3+ concurrent sessions

WI-3.2: Concurrent Project Processing

Priority: P0 (Critical) Estimated Effort: 3 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: WI-3.1

Description: Refactor main loop to process multiple projects efficiently

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Processes all active projects each cycle
  • Isolates errors per project
  • Maintains separate state per project
  • No interference between projects
  • Resource usage acceptable (<5% CPU)

Tasks:

  1. Refactor Process-Project for parallel execution
  2. Add project isolation logic
  3. Implement error quarantine per project
  4. Add resource monitoring
  5. Test with 5 concurrent projects
  6. Optimize for performance

WI-3.3: Git Integration Module

Priority: P0 (Critical) Estimated Effort: 5 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: None (can start early)

Description: Create Git wrapper functions for all operations

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Can create branches
  • Can commit changes
  • Can push to remote
  • Can detect commit completion
  • Handles authentication
  • Error handling for Git failures

Tasks:

  1. Implement Invoke-GitBranch function
  2. Implement Invoke-GitCommit function
  3. Implement Invoke-GitPush function
  4. Implement Wait-ForGitCommit function
  5. Add Git status checking
  6. Add authentication handling
  7. Test with test repository

WI-3.4: Phase Transition Logic

Priority: P0 (Critical) Estimated Effort: 4 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: WI-3.3

Description: Implement phase-based workflow management

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Detects phase completion
  • Triggers commits at phase boundaries
  • Advances to next phase automatically
  • Sends notifications on transitions
  • Logs phase transitions
  • Handles final phase completion

Tasks:

  1. Implement Invoke-PhaseTransition function
  2. Add phase completion detection
  3. Implement commit triggering
  4. Add next phase initialization
  5. Implement project completion detection
  6. Add transition logging
  7. Test full phase progression

WI-3.5: GitHub Pull Request Creation

Priority: P0 (Critical) Estimated Effort: 4 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: WI-3.3

Description: Automate PR creation using GitHub API

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Can create PRs via GitHub API
  • Generates meaningful PR titles
  • Includes phase summary in body
  • Links to decision logs
  • Handles API authentication
  • Returns PR URL

Tasks:

  1. Implement New-GitHubPullRequest function
  2. Add GitHub API integration
  3. Implement PR title/body generation
  4. Add authentication handling
  5. Add error handling for API failures
  6. Test PR creation
  7. Verify PR formatting

WI-3.6: Session Recovery System

Priority: P1 (High) Estimated Effort: 4 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: WI-3.1

Description: Enable recovery from watchdog or browser crashes

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Detects when sessions disappear
  • Saves state before shutdown
  • Resumes from saved state
  • Notifies on recovery
  • Handles corrupted state files
  • Manual recovery option available

Tasks:

  1. Implement state persistence on shutdown
  2. Implement Restore-ProjectState function
  3. Add session loss detection
  4. Add automatic state recovery
  5. Implement manual recovery command
  6. Add recovery notifications
  7. Test crash scenarios

WI-3.7: Progress Reporting

Priority: P2 (Medium) Estimated Effort: 3 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: WI-3.4

Description: Generate progress reports and summaries

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Daily progress summaries
  • Per-project status reports
  • Phase completion reports
  • Time tracking per phase
  • Markdown-formatted reports
  • Can export to CSV

Tasks:

  1. Implement Generate-ProgressReport function
  2. Implement Generate-DailySummary function
  3. Add time tracking logic
  4. Create report templates
  5. Add CSV export
  6. Schedule daily reports

WI-3.8: Integration Testing

Priority: P1 (High) Estimated Effort: 4 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: WI-3.2, WI-3.4, WI-3.5

Description: Test multi-project workflows with Git operations

Acceptance Criteria:

  • 3+ projects monitored simultaneously
  • Phase transitions work correctly
  • Commits created at right times
  • PRs created successfully
  • Recovery works after interruption
  • 8+ hour continuous operation

Tasks:

  1. Set up 3 test projects
  2. Start all projects in Claude Code
  3. Monitor phase progressions
  4. Verify all commits
  5. Verify all PRs
  6. Test recovery scenarios
  7. Review all logs
  8. Document issues

Sprint 3 Metrics

Total Story Points: 31 Total Estimated Hours: 31 Key Deliverables:

  • Multi-project monitoring
  • Git operations (commit, push, PR)
  • Phase-based workflows
  • Session recovery
  • Progress reporting

Sprint 4: Polish, Testing & Documentation

Dates: Week 4 Goal: Production-ready system with comprehensive testing and documentation Success Criteria: System can be deployed by any user and runs reliably for days

Work Items

WI-4.1: Comprehensive Error Handling

Priority: P0 (Critical) Estimated Effort: 4 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: Sprint 3 Complete

Description: Add robust error handling across all modules

Acceptance Criteria:

  • All functions have try/catch blocks
  • Meaningful error messages
  • Errors logged appropriately
  • Graceful degradation on failures
  • No unhandled exceptions
  • Recovery attempts before failing

Tasks:

  1. Audit all functions for error handling
  2. Add try/catch to all external calls
  3. Improve error messages
  4. Add error recovery logic
  5. Test failure scenarios
  6. Document error behaviors

WI-4.2: Unit Test Suite

Priority: P0 (Critical) Estimated Effort: 6 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: None (can start early)

Description: Create comprehensive unit tests using Pester

Acceptance Criteria:

  • 80%+ code coverage
  • All core functions tested
  • Mock Windows MCP calls
  • Mock API calls
  • Tests run in CI/CD
  • All tests passing

Tasks:

  1. Set up Pester test framework
  2. Create test fixtures
  3. Write tests for state detection
  4. Write tests for decision engine
  5. Write tests for Git operations
  6. Write tests for logging
  7. Set up test runner
  8. Achieve 80% coverage

WI-4.3: Integration Test Suite

Priority: P1 (High) Estimated Effort: 4 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: WI-4.2

Description: Create end-to-end integration tests

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Tests cover full workflows
  • Tests use test repositories
  • Tests verify file outputs
  • Tests check Git operations
  • Tests validate notifications
  • All tests automated

Tasks:

  1. Create test project repository
  2. Write full workflow tests
  3. Write multi-project tests
  4. Write recovery tests
  5. Write Git operation tests
  6. Automate test execution
  7. Document test procedures

WI-4.4: Performance Optimization

Priority: P1 (High) Estimated Effort: 3 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: Sprint 3 Complete

Description: Optimize for resource usage and responsiveness

Acceptance Criteria:

  • CPU usage <5% when idle
  • Memory usage <200MB for 5 projects
  • State capture <2 seconds
  • Decision latency <5 seconds
  • No memory leaks
  • Efficient polling

Tasks:

  1. Profile resource usage
  2. Optimize state detection
  3. Add caching where appropriate
  4. Optimize logging I/O
  5. Add resource monitoring
  6. Load test with 10 projects
  7. Document performance metrics

WI-4.5: User Documentation

Priority: P0 (Critical) Estimated Effort: 4 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: All features complete

Description: Create comprehensive user-facing documentation

Acceptance Criteria:

  • README.md complete and accurate
  • Quick start guide works
  • All commands documented
  • Configuration fully explained
  • Examples provided
  • Screenshots included

Tasks:

  1. Update README.md
  2. Create QUICKSTART.md
  3. Create CONFIGURATION.md
  4. Add usage examples
  5. Add troubleshooting section
  6. Capture screenshots
  7. Review for clarity

WI-4.6: Developer Documentation

Priority: P1 (High) Estimated Effort: 3 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: All features complete

Description: Document architecture and development guidelines

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Architecture documented
  • API references complete
  • Development setup guide
  • Contribution guidelines
  • Code style guide
  • Module interaction diagrams

Tasks:

  1. Finalize ARCHITECTURE.md
  2. Create API-REFERENCE.md
  3. Create DEVELOPMENT.md
  4. Create CONTRIBUTING.md
  5. Add code comments
  6. Generate module diagrams

WI-4.7: Troubleshooting Guide

Priority: P1 (High) Estimated Effort: 2 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: Testing complete

Description: Document common issues and solutions

Acceptance Criteria:

  • All known issues documented
  • Solutions provided
  • Diagnostic commands included
  • FAQ section complete
  • Contact information provided

Tasks:

  1. Create TROUBLESHOOTING.md
  2. Document common issues
  3. Add diagnostic procedures
  4. Create FAQ section
  5. Add support contact info
  6. Test solutions work

WI-4.8: Installation Wizard Enhancement

Priority: P2 (Medium) Estimated Effort: 3 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: WI-4.5

Description: Improve installation script with better UX

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Interactive prompts
  • Prerequisite auto-installation
  • Configuration wizard
  • Validation steps
  • Rollback on failure
  • Success confirmation

Tasks:

  1. Add interactive prompts
  2. Add module auto-installation
  3. Add configuration wizard
  4. Add validation checks
  5. Add rollback logic
  6. Test on clean system

WI-4.9: Production Deployment Testing

Priority: P0 (Critical) Estimated Effort: 4 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: All WI-4.x items

Description: Deploy and test in production-like environment

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Deployed on clean Windows system
  • All prerequisites met
  • 3+ real projects configured
  • 24+ hour continuous operation
  • No critical bugs
  • Performance acceptable

Tasks:

  1. Set up clean Windows VM
  2. Run installation wizard
  3. Configure 3 real projects
  4. Start watchdog
  5. Monitor for 24+ hours
  6. Collect metrics
  7. Review all logs
  8. Fix any critical issues
  9. Validate success criteria

WI-4.10: Release Preparation

Priority: P0 (Critical) Estimated Effort: 2 hours Assigned To: Developer Dependencies: WI-4.9

Description: Prepare for v1.0 release

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Version numbers updated
  • CHANGELOG.md created
  • Release notes written
  • GitHub release created
  • Installation package ready
  • License file included

Tasks:

  1. Update version numbers
  2. Create CHANGELOG.md
  3. Write release notes
  4. Create GitHub release
  5. Package installation files
  6. Add LICENSE file
  7. Tag release in Git

Sprint 4 Metrics

Total Story Points: 35 Total Estimated Hours: 35 Key Deliverables:

  • Comprehensive testing (unit + integration)
  • Complete documentation
  • Performance optimization
  • Production-ready deployment
  • v1.0 release

Project Summary

Total Effort

  • Total Story Points: 122
  • Total Estimated Hours: 122 hours
  • Sprints: 4
  • Work Items: 38

Risk Mitigation

High Risk Items:

  1. Windows MCP reliability - Mitigation: Extensive error handling and retry logic
  2. API cost overruns - Mitigation: Strict cost limits and fallback to rules
  3. Session detection accuracy - Mitigation: Comprehensive testing and refinement
  4. Multi-project interference - Mitigation: Strong isolation and separate state

Success Metrics

  • Can monitor 5+ projects simultaneously
  • 95%+ state detection accuracy
  • Auto-continues on TODOs with 90%+ success rate
  • Stays under $10/day API costs
  • Runs 24+ hours without crashes
  • Complete documentation
  • 80%+ code coverage

Definition of Done

A work item is "Done" when:

  • Code implemented and reviewed
  • Unit tests written and passing
  • Integration tested
  • Documentation updated
  • Acceptance criteria met
  • No critical bugs
  • Demo-able

Sprint Schedule

Sprint Dates Focus Key Deliverable
Sprint 1 Week 1 Foundation Basic watchdog working
Sprint 2 Week 2 Intelligence AI-powered decisions
Sprint 3 Week 3 Scale Multi-project + Git
Sprint 4 Week 4 Polish Production-ready

Notes for Developers

Daily Workflow

  1. Review previous day's progress
  2. Update TODO list
  3. Work on highest priority item
  4. Test incrementally
  5. Commit frequently
  6. Update documentation
  7. End-of-day status update

Code Standards

  • Follow PowerShell best practices
  • Use approved verbs (Get-, Set-, Invoke-, etc.)
  • Comment complex logic
  • Write tests for all functions
  • Keep functions focused (single responsibility)
  • Handle errors gracefully

Communication

  • Daily standup notes in logs
  • Blockers reported immediately
  • Questions documented and answered
  • Decisions logged with reasoning

Created: 2024-11-22 Last Updated: 2024-11-22 Version: 1.0