If I mark 2 feeds as duplicates and the majority of users subscribed to the feeds acknowledges the dup, then it gets accepted.
Have some sort of merit system where users with more correctness are given more authority.
In the end, if 2 feeds are the same but one is more valid, it should favor agressive consolidation versus accepting someone's minor opinion.
Someone with higher authority can split or merge.
I dunno. Just trying to think of some simple premises to avoid any one person or group of persons from being in charge of merges.
If I mark 2 feeds as duplicates and the majority of users subscribed to the feeds acknowledges the dup, then it gets accepted.
Have some sort of merit system where users with more correctness are given more authority.
In the end, if 2 feeds are the same but one is more valid, it should favor agressive consolidation versus accepting someone's minor opinion.
Someone with higher authority can split or merge.
I dunno. Just trying to think of some simple premises to avoid any one person or group of persons from being in charge of merges.