Replies: 1 comment
-
|
PR #1925 is in flight to address how agents install / uinstall themselves and how to use shared functionality among that the skill generation. Please have a look at it to see if it can address this concern. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
We recently started moving some agents (e.g. Codex) to native skills (
.agents/skills/<skill>/SKILL.md) instead of extracting prompt/command templates.While investigating hooks vs skills invocation (#1918), another issue surfaced: Spec-kit currently has multiple SKILL.md generators, and they can drift.
Current generators
Native skills in template zip (release packaging scripts)
.github/workflows/scripts/create-release-packages.sh/.ps1SKILL.mdduring CI packaging.Init-time conversion (
install_ai_skills())speckit.*.mdcommand templates intoskills/<name>/SKILL.md.compatibility,metadata.source, enhanced descriptions, etc).Extension/preset overrides (
agents.CommandRegistrar.render_skill_command())Why this matters
If these generators don’t share the same frontmatter schema + naming rules, we get subtle inconsistencies:
compatibility/metadata.sourcein some skillsdescriptionquality depending on which generator produced the skillcommand_id(often dotted, e.g.speckit.plan) and runtimeskill_name(hyphenated for Codex, dotted for Kimi)This becomes more important as agents converge on skills, and as hooks/extensions rely on consistent command identifiers.
Suggested direction (discussion)
Decide what is the canonical identifier:
speckit.planas a stable logicalcommand_id, and map to agent-specific skill names/invocation stringsDecide how to prevent drift:
Linking to the hook/invocation discussion because they’re related: #1918
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions