Persona Overview
- Agent: agentic-workflows skill/router
- Scenarios Generated: 10 across 5 personas
- Scenarios Tested: 4 representative scenarios
- Average Quality Score: 4.6/5.0
The available runtime exposed agentic-workflows as a skill/router rather than a promptable custom-agent endpoint. Findings below are based on the loaded skill behavior and referenced .github/aw/*.md workflow guidance.
Key Findings
- Strongest responses are expected for PR review, visual regression, deployment monitoring, and scheduled digest patterns because these are directly covered in
.github/aw/*.md references.
- The guidance consistently keeps the main agent job read-only and routes writes through
safe-outputs.
- Trigger selection is clear for common cases:
pull_request, workflow_run, deployment_status, fuzzy schedule, and slash_command.
- The weakest area is domain-specific report quality for PM/QA use cases, where prompt examples are thinner.
Top Patterns
- PR tasks usually map to
pull_request with scoped paths when possible.
- Monitoring tasks distinguish in-repo Actions via
workflow_run from external services via deployment_status.
- Common tools are GitHub
gh-proxy, playwright for UI checks, and cache-memory for baselines/state.
- Security practices emphasize read-only permissions, minimal network, safe outputs, and
noop for no-op runs.
View High Quality Responses
| Scenario |
Score |
Why it worked well |
| Backend migration safety |
5.0 |
Dedicated database migration pattern covers trigger, path filters, permissions, safe output, and prompt focus. |
| DevOps deployment failure |
4.6 |
Clear workflow_run vs deployment_status decision and incident issue pattern. |
| Frontend visual regression |
4.4 |
Strong playwright + cache-memory guidance with localhost domain restrictions. |
View Areas for Improvement
- Product and QA reporting scenarios need more concrete prompt examples for grouping findings by stakeholder impact, owner, and actionability.
- External deployment monitoring could better describe safe ways to include provider log URLs without broad network access.
- The test harness could not prompt a standalone
agentic-workflows custom-agent endpoint directly; only the skill/router interface was available.
Recommendations
- Add persona-specific examples to
.github/aw/workflow-patterns.md for QA coverage reports and PM stakeholder digests.
- Expand
.github/aw/deployment-status.md with safe external log-linking guidance and provider-specific context boundaries.
- Add a compact generated-workflow quality checklist to
.github/aw/create-agentic-workflow.md covering trigger fit, tool fit, safe outputs, permissions, network, and prompt clarity.
References: §27290825275
Generated by 🎭 Agent Persona Explorer · 110.2 AIC · ⌖ 2.97 AIC · ⊞ 23.1K · ◷
Persona Overview
The available runtime exposed
agentic-workflowsas a skill/router rather than a promptable custom-agent endpoint. Findings below are based on the loaded skill behavior and referenced.github/aw/*.mdworkflow guidance.Key Findings
.github/aw/*.mdreferences.safe-outputs.pull_request,workflow_run,deployment_status, fuzzyschedule, andslash_command.Top Patterns
pull_requestwith scoped paths when possible.workflow_runfrom external services viadeployment_status.gh-proxy,playwrightfor UI checks, andcache-memoryfor baselines/state.noopfor no-op runs.View High Quality Responses
workflow_runvsdeployment_statusdecision and incident issue pattern.playwright+cache-memoryguidance with localhost domain restrictions.View Areas for Improvement
agentic-workflowscustom-agent endpoint directly; only the skill/router interface was available.Recommendations
.github/aw/workflow-patterns.mdfor QA coverage reports and PM stakeholder digests..github/aw/deployment-status.mdwith safe external log-linking guidance and provider-specific context boundaries..github/aw/create-agentic-workflow.mdcovering trigger fit, tool fit, safe outputs, permissions, network, and prompt clarity.References: §27290825275