What type(s) of issue is this?
Ambiguity, Incompleteness
What is the issue?
The word "profile" occurs in two places in the spec v1.2:
section 4.2:
dct:conformsTo [...] This property points to a profile that contains the specification of the FAIR Data Point's metadata schema (in SHACL).
section 6:
Each metadata record SHOULD have a reference to its own profile which, on its turn, MUST point to the metadata schema expressed in SHACL;
(my emphasis)
However, no clear definition of the word "profile" is provided.
I can deduce from the above that it must be something that either "contains" or "points to" a metadata schema in SHACL, but that is already ambiguous.
Is it a DCAT profile ("a named set of constraints based on DCAT"), dublin core application profile ("a document [...] that specifies and describes the metadata used in a particular application"), or a profile in the sense of The Profiles Vocabulary?
The FDP reference implementation apparently uses the The Profiles Vocabulary, as can be seen in the source:
private static final String PROFILE_PREFIX = "http://www.w3.org/ns/dx/prof/";
This makes sense considering that prof:Profile is a subclass of dcterms:Standard.
According to DCAT resource_conforms_to, dcterms:conformsTo has range dcterms:Standard, which can be any number of things:
This property SHOULD be used to indicate the model, schema, ontology, view or profile that the cataloged resource content conforms to.
What type(s) of issue is this?
Ambiguity, Incompleteness
What is the issue?
The word "profile" occurs in two places in the spec v1.2:
section 4.2:
section 6:
(my emphasis)
However, no clear definition of the word "profile" is provided.
I can deduce from the above that it must be something that either "contains" or "points to" a metadata schema in SHACL, but that is already ambiguous.
Is it a DCAT profile ("a named set of constraints based on DCAT"), dublin core application profile ("a document [...] that specifies and describes the metadata used in a particular application"), or a profile in the sense of The Profiles Vocabulary?
The FDP reference implementation apparently uses the The Profiles Vocabulary, as can be seen in the source:
This makes sense considering that
prof:Profileis a subclass ofdcterms:Standard.According to DCAT resource_conforms_to,
dcterms:conformsTohas rangedcterms:Standard, which can be any number of things: