Bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.48.0 to 2.49.0#45
Bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.48.0 to 2.49.0#45dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
Skipping auto-merge: the PR tests are failing and the Error Prone 2.49.0 notes explicitly remove/replace APIs, so this bump is not low-risk enough for automatic merge. |
Bumps [com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core](https://github.com/google/error-prone) from 2.48.0 to 2.49.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/google/error-prone/releases) - [Commits](google/error-prone@v2.48.0...v2.49.0) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core dependency-version: 2.49.0 dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-minor ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
0986e5d to
b6d8cc9
Compare
|
Refreshed this dependency bump onto current Validation on #49:
I also checked the repository for use of the Error Prone APIs removed in 2.49.0 and did not find any usage. |
|
Superseded by #49, which has been merged into main with the required NullAway compatibility fix. |
|
OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next major or minor version, let me know by commenting If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts on it. |
Rebasing might not happen immediately, so don't worry if this takes some time.
Note: if you make any changes to this PR yourself, they will take precedence over the rebase.
Bumps com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.48.0 to 2.49.0.
Release notes
Sourced from com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core's releases.
Commits
89d75c1Release Error Prone 2.49.00b7b03bFix up some javadoc on `ModifySourceCollectionInStream.isStreamApiInvocationO...fe5a7b1Remove old FieldMatchers APId54a1d1Fix up someFinallyjavadocs.d93b319[RefactorSwitch] bugfix comment handlingff59782[IfChainToSwitch] cleanup redundant conditions in ternary. No functional cha...43b6df6Generalise DuplicateAssertion to handle check* methods.2c4346fFix a bug inBooleanLiteral: it currently suggests replacing `Boolean.FALSE...559039b[IfChainToSwitch] doc-only change. fix typo in code comments.393c61c[IfChainToSwitch] enhance code generation to emit unnamed variables, when sup...