Skip to content
Python CI

use decorator instead in super simple example #873

Sign in to view logs

use decorator instead in super simple example

use decorator instead in super simple example #873

Triggered via pull request September 24, 2025 00:16
@dphuang2dphuang2
opened #212
change-simple-example-to-use-decorator
Status Success
Total duration 5m 57s
Artifacts 4

ci.yml

on: pull_request
Lint & Type Check
1m 7s
Lint & Type Check
Matrix: test-core
Batch Evaluation Tests
1m 9s
Batch Evaluation Tests
MCP End-to-End Tests
53s
MCP End-to-End Tests
Upload Coverage
8s
Upload Coverage
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

3 warnings
Lint & Type Check: eval_protocol/mcp/__init__.py#L49
Operation on "__all__" is not supported, so exported symbol list may be incorrect (reportUnsupportedDunderAll)
Lint & Type Check: eval_protocol/mcp/__init__.py#L49
Operation on "__all__" is not supported, so exported symbol list may be incorrect (reportUnsupportedDunderAll)
MCP End-to-End Tests
No files were found with the provided path: coverage.xml. No artifacts will be uploaded.

Artifacts

Produced during runtime
Name Size Digest
coverage-batch-eval Expired
36 KB
sha256:fe8ba196a6b538da5d08bdff8be73cb671f636b9b3645d85aa699b01fd9e30c8
coverage-core-3.10 Expired
43.9 KB
sha256:621cce568c8865104988c2bc41c6276306738c177409b705c405492befc1f311
coverage-core-3.11 Expired
43.9 KB
sha256:6a1e1c584e75ad767744c74e142a8134065cbf1a7121d51a4352b4d7de221c9f
coverage-core-3.12 Expired
43.9 KB
sha256:536483565464e2a5d5e462ac23278b86a13134e9c1725cbb172fc0f0dd655543