Type of issue
Inaccurate
What documentation page is affected
https://www.elastic.co/docs/solutions/security/
What happened?
Consistent Terminology for "Elastic Defend" vs "Elastic Endpoint"
Summary
The Core Concepts section on the Security overview page distinguishes between these two terms:
| Term |
What It Is |
Where It Exists |
| Elastic Defend |
A Fleet Integration (policy/configuration) |
Fleet UI, Kibana |
| Elastic Endpoint |
The security process that runs on hosts |
Host filesystem, process list |
A few other pages use these terms interchangeably, which could cause confusion. This issue collects those instances with suggested alternatives.
Instances
1. "System requirements to install Elastic Defend"
Locations:
Current:
"Ensure you have the minimum system requirements to install Elastic Defend."
Suggested:
"Ensure your hosts meet the minimum system requirements to run Elastic Endpoint."
2. "Installing Elastic Defend on macOS"
Location:
Current:
"If you're installing Elastic Defend on macOS..."
Suggested:
"If you're deploying Elastic Agent with the Defend integration to macOS hosts..."
3. "Elastic Defend generates an alert"
Locations:
Current:
"If any of these behaviors are detected, Elastic Defend generates an alert..."
Suggested:
"If any of these behaviors are detected, Elastic Endpoint generates an alert..."
(Some pages already use "Elastic Endpoint" for this context.)
4. "Endpoints running Elastic Defend"
Location:
Current:
"The Endpoints page allows administrators to view and manage endpoints that are running the Elastic Defend integration."
Suggested:
"The Endpoints page allows administrators to view and manage endpoints protected by the Elastic Defend integration."
5. "Elastic Defend requirements" page
Location:
The content covers host-level requirements for Elastic Endpoint (OS versions, macOS permissions, etc.). Consider adding a clarifying intro:
"These are the system requirements for hosts to run Elastic Endpoint, the component deployed by the Elastic Defend integration."
6. "Install" vs "Add" for integrations
Location:
Current:
"In the Add agent flyout that appears after you install the Elastic Defend integration..."
Suggested:
"In the Add agent flyout that appears after you add the Elastic Defend integration..."
7. Mixed terminology in same paragraph
Location:
Current:
"...you may require you to grant Elastic Endpoint Full Disk Access... Refer to Elastic Defend requirements"
The sentence uses "Elastic Endpoint" but links to "Elastic Defend requirements."
References
Additional info
No response
Type of issue
Inaccurate
What documentation page is affected
https://www.elastic.co/docs/solutions/security/
What happened?
Consistent Terminology for "Elastic Defend" vs "Elastic Endpoint"
Summary
The Core Concepts section on the Security overview page distinguishes between these two terms:
A few other pages use these terms interchangeably, which could cause confusion. This issue collects those instances with suggested alternatives.
Instances
1. "System requirements to install Elastic Defend"
Locations:
Current:
Suggested:
2. "Installing Elastic Defend on macOS"
Location:
Current:
Suggested:
3. "Elastic Defend generates an alert"
Locations:
Current:
Suggested:
(Some pages already use "Elastic Endpoint" for this context.)
4. "Endpoints running Elastic Defend"
Location:
Current:
Suggested:
5. "Elastic Defend requirements" page
Location:
The content covers host-level requirements for Elastic Endpoint (OS versions, macOS permissions, etc.). Consider adding a clarifying intro:
6. "Install" vs "Add" for integrations
Location:
Current:
Suggested:
7. Mixed terminology in same paragraph
Location:
Current:
The sentence uses "Elastic Endpoint" but links to "Elastic Defend requirements."
References
Additional info
No response