Summary
Kotlin object companion fields aren't surfaced as public properties on the outer class binding, so consumers can't reach the singleton through the binding alone. They have to fall back to raw JNI (FindClass + GetStaticFieldID("Companion") + GetStaticObjectField) to bootstrap the companion peer.
Repro
Pick any AndroidX type with a Kotlin object companion. androidx.compose.foundation.text.KeyboardOptions is the case I just hit:
public class KeyboardOptions /* ... */ {
public companion object {
public val Default: KeyboardOptions = KeyboardOptions(/* ... */)
}
}
Kotlin lowers that to bytecode:
public final class androidx.compose.foundation.text.KeyboardOptions {
public static final androidx.compose.foundation.text.KeyboardOptions$Companion Companion;
public static final androidx.compose.foundation.text.KeyboardOptions$Companion access$getCompanion$cp();
...
}
After binding through Xamarin.AndroidX.Compose.Foundation 1.11.2.2:
AndroidX.Compose.Foundation.Text.KeyboardOptions — bound (sealed class)
KeyboardOptions.Companion nested type — bound with [Register("androidx/compose/foundation/text/KeyboardOptions$Companion", DoNotGenerateAcw = true)]
Companion.Default — bound (instance getter, returns KeyboardOptions)
KeyboardOptions.Copy(int, Boolean?, int, int, ...) — bound
What's missing:
- No
KeyboardOptions.Companion static property/field accessor on the outer class. Decompiled the binding's outer KeyboardOptions and the Companion field is dropped — there's no public static KeyboardOptions.Companion Companion { get; } member to call.
- No public ctor (stripped —
@JvmInline value class params hit the -d9O1mEE mangling).
- No
KeyboardOptionsKt static helper.
So even though the entire downstream API (Companion.Default, Copy(...)) is bound, there's no binding-only way to get the Companion instance to start the call chain.
Current workaround
Hand-roll the singleton bootstrap once per affected type. Verbatim from Microsoft.AndroidX.Compose/src/Microsoft.AndroidX.Compose/KeyboardOptionsCompanion.cs:
IntPtr cls = JNIEnv.FindClass("androidx/compose/foundation/text/KeyboardOptions");
IntPtr field = JNIEnv.GetStaticFieldID(cls, "Companion",
"Landroidx/compose/foundation/text/KeyboardOptions$Companion;");
IntPtr local = JNIEnv.GetStaticObjectField(cls, field);
s_companion_ref = JNIEnv.NewGlobalRef(local);
JNIEnv.DeleteLocalRef(local);
return new Companion(s_companion_ref, JniHandleOwnership.DoNotTransfer);
Everything downstream (Default, Copy(...)) is the binding — only the static-field read needs JNI. We already have the same workaround for androidx.compose.ui.text.TextStyle.Companion (TextStyleCompanion.cs) and need it for several more (ContentScale.Companion, Alignment.Companion, FontWeight.Companion, etc.).
Proposed fix
Single Metadata.xml fix-up per androidx.compose.* transform that has a Kotlin object companion. For KeyboardOptions:
<!-- androidx.compose.foundation/Transforms/Metadata.xml -->
<attr path="/api/package[@name='androidx.compose.foundation.text']/class[@name='KeyboardOptions']/field[@name='Companion']"
name="visible">true</attr>
After which the binder should emit public static KeyboardOptions.Companion Companion { get; } on the outer class, and consumers can write KeyboardOptions.Companion.Default directly. We'd then delete the hand-rolled JNI bootstrap files.
Possible complication
The binder sometimes hides Companion fields because the property name collides with the nested type name (you end up with two Companion members at the same scope — one type, one property). C# handles that fine, but the generator may have proactively dropped the field to avoid the conflict. If that's the cause, the fix becomes either:
<attr ... name="managedName">CompanionInstance</attr> to rename the property, or
<remove-node> + <add-node> injecting an explicit property body.
Both still live in Metadata.xml — no generator code change needed.
Affected packages
Every Compose package that exposes a Kotlin object companion. Most-impactful ones I've already had to bootstrap by hand or know I'll need to:
Xamarin.AndroidX.Compose.Foundation — KeyboardOptions.Companion
Xamarin.AndroidX.Compose.UI.Text — TextStyle.Companion, TextDecoration.Companion, FontWeight.Companion, FontFamily.Companion, FontStyle.Companion
Xamarin.AndroidX.Compose.UI — Alignment.Companion, Modifier.Companion, ContentScale.Companion
Xamarin.AndroidX.Compose.UI.Graphics — Color.Companion, Shape.Companion family
Xamarin.AndroidX.Compose.Material3 — MaterialTheme.Companion, many of the *Defaults types
Not Compose-specific — the same gap should exist on any Kotlin-authored AndroidX type with an object companion.
Related
jonathanpeppers/Microsoft.AndroidX.Compose#246 — most recent occurrence (KeyboardOptionsCompanion.cs).
TextStyleCompanion.cs in the same repo — first occurrence; we hit the identical pattern in Phase 1 and shipped the same JNI workaround.
Summary
Kotlin
objectcompanion fields aren't surfaced as public properties on the outer class binding, so consumers can't reach the singleton through the binding alone. They have to fall back to raw JNI (FindClass+GetStaticFieldID("Companion")+GetStaticObjectField) to bootstrap the companion peer.Repro
Pick any AndroidX type with a Kotlin
objectcompanion.androidx.compose.foundation.text.KeyboardOptionsis the case I just hit:Kotlin lowers that to bytecode:
After binding through
Xamarin.AndroidX.Compose.Foundation 1.11.2.2:AndroidX.Compose.Foundation.Text.KeyboardOptions— bound (sealed class)KeyboardOptions.Companionnested type — bound with[Register("androidx/compose/foundation/text/KeyboardOptions$Companion", DoNotGenerateAcw = true)]Companion.Default— bound (instance getter, returnsKeyboardOptions)KeyboardOptions.Copy(int, Boolean?, int, int, ...)— boundWhat's missing:
KeyboardOptions.Companionstatic property/field accessor on the outer class. Decompiled the binding's outerKeyboardOptionsand theCompanionfield is dropped — there's nopublic static KeyboardOptions.Companion Companion { get; }member to call.@JvmInline value classparams hit the-d9O1mEEmangling).KeyboardOptionsKtstatic helper.So even though the entire downstream API (
Companion.Default,Copy(...)) is bound, there's no binding-only way to get theCompanioninstance to start the call chain.Current workaround
Hand-roll the singleton bootstrap once per affected type. Verbatim from
Microsoft.AndroidX.Compose/src/Microsoft.AndroidX.Compose/KeyboardOptionsCompanion.cs:Everything downstream (
Default,Copy(...)) is the binding — only the static-field read needs JNI. We already have the same workaround forandroidx.compose.ui.text.TextStyle.Companion(TextStyleCompanion.cs) and need it for several more (ContentScale.Companion,Alignment.Companion,FontWeight.Companion, etc.).Proposed fix
Single Metadata.xml fix-up per
androidx.compose.*transform that has a Kotlinobjectcompanion. ForKeyboardOptions:After which the binder should emit
public static KeyboardOptions.Companion Companion { get; }on the outer class, and consumers can writeKeyboardOptions.Companion.Defaultdirectly. We'd then delete the hand-rolled JNI bootstrap files.Possible complication
The binder sometimes hides Companion fields because the property name collides with the nested type name (you end up with two
Companionmembers at the same scope — one type, one property). C# handles that fine, but the generator may have proactively dropped the field to avoid the conflict. If that's the cause, the fix becomes either:<attr ... name="managedName">CompanionInstance</attr>to rename the property, or<remove-node>+<add-node>injecting an explicit property body.Both still live in Metadata.xml — no generator code change needed.
Affected packages
Every Compose package that exposes a Kotlin
objectcompanion. Most-impactful ones I've already had to bootstrap by hand or know I'll need to:Xamarin.AndroidX.Compose.Foundation—KeyboardOptions.CompanionXamarin.AndroidX.Compose.UI.Text—TextStyle.Companion,TextDecoration.Companion,FontWeight.Companion,FontFamily.Companion,FontStyle.CompanionXamarin.AndroidX.Compose.UI—Alignment.Companion,Modifier.Companion,ContentScale.CompanionXamarin.AndroidX.Compose.UI.Graphics—Color.Companion,Shape.CompanionfamilyXamarin.AndroidX.Compose.Material3—MaterialTheme.Companion, many of the*DefaultstypesNot Compose-specific — the same gap should exist on any Kotlin-authored AndroidX type with an
objectcompanion.Related
jonathanpeppers/Microsoft.AndroidX.Compose#246— most recent occurrence (KeyboardOptionsCompanion.cs).TextStyleCompanion.csin the same repo — first occurrence; we hit the identical pattern in Phase 1 and shipped the same JNI workaround.