Problem
tests/verdicts.test.mjs has a case-insensitive test for single verdicts, but no test like:
"VERDICT: pass\nVERDICT: FAIL"
to verify case-insensitive last-wins behavior.
Suggested Fix
Add:
test("parseVerdict uses last match case-insensitively", () => {
const result = parseVerdict("VERDICT: pass\nSome text\nVERDICT: FAIL");
assert.equal(result.verdict, "FAIL");
});
Expected behavior
The affected workflow should behave consistently with the project intent described in the title: No test for parseVerdict with mixed-case verdicts in same text — case-insensitive last-wins untested should either be handled correctly, documented clearly, or covered by regression tests so users and maintainers can rely on it.
Actual behavior
The current implementation, documentation, or test coverage does not address this case as described above. The issue body captures the observed gap and the file/component where it was found.
Impact
Leaving this unresolved can cause confusing user behavior, missed regressions, weaker safety guarantees, or maintenance friction depending on the affected component. It is worth tracking separately because the finding is specific and actionable.
Duplicate check
Before/while filing, open issues were reviewed and searched by the main keywords from this title. No exact open duplicate was intentionally kept; if maintainers identify overlap later, this issue can be consolidated into the older/more complete report.
Problem
tests/verdicts.test.mjshas a case-insensitive test for single verdicts, but no test like:to verify case-insensitive last-wins behavior.
Suggested Fix
Add:
Expected behavior
The affected workflow should behave consistently with the project intent described in the title:
No test for parseVerdict with mixed-case verdicts in same text — case-insensitive last-wins untestedshould either be handled correctly, documented clearly, or covered by regression tests so users and maintainers can rely on it.Actual behavior
The current implementation, documentation, or test coverage does not address this case as described above. The issue body captures the observed gap and the file/component where it was found.
Impact
Leaving this unresolved can cause confusing user behavior, missed regressions, weaker safety guarantees, or maintenance friction depending on the affected component. It is worth tracking separately because the finding is specific and actionable.
Duplicate check
Before/while filing, open issues were reviewed and searched by the main keywords from this title. No exact open duplicate was intentionally kept; if maintainers identify overlap later, this issue can be consolidated into the older/more complete report.