Skip to content

Conversation

@Mr0grog
Copy link
Collaborator

@Mr0grog Mr0grog commented Sep 11, 2025

This package general works on Deno and Bun, but we’ve never formally said so. This adds integration tests for them and adds a note about it to the README.

(Inspired by my exploration of proxy support over in #132.)

@Mr0grog Mr0grog force-pushed the if-we-support-deno-we-should-say-it branch 2 times, most recently from 494f698 to 12db250 Compare September 11, 2025 02:47
Mr0grog added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2025
This is a follow-on to the official Deno support work in #148.
Mr0grog added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2025
This is a follow-on to the official Deno support work in #148.
@Mr0grog Mr0grog changed the title Formally declare Deno compatibility Formally declare Deno & Bun compatibility Sep 11, 2025
@Mr0grog
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Mr0grog commented Sep 11, 2025

Added Bun support information here, too.

This also breaks it up into a library and an actual script. This is in preparation for making it possible to run in TypeScript for Deno.
Works for me, fails on CI, yay.
This is a follow-on to the official Deno support work in #148.
@Mr0grog Mr0grog force-pushed the if-we-support-deno-we-should-say-it branch from f883b22 to fb07dcc Compare December 5, 2025 17:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants