Skip to content

[Tracking] Features derived from existing compiler/runtime metadata #182

@cssbruno

Description

@cssbruno

Tracking issue. A codebase audit (compiler IR plus runtime/addons) found that the highest-leverage next features share one shape: metadata GOWDK already computes, gaining a new consumer. None of these touch the parser or change language semantics, except #177, which is a deliberate small lift.

Suggested order: #178 first (makes #109 and the VS Code issues richer), then #175/#176, #174 alongside #165, #177 before the M14 reactivity work needs it, #179 coordinated with #166, #180/#181 anytime.

Not pursued now, on purpose: cron/job scheduler adapter (#114 deferral), client-language type system (wait for #97-#101 to settle the surface), LSP rename (VS Code work #103-#107 first).

Related: #170 (adapters), #165/#148 (spec exports), #147 (reactivity design input to #130).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    DX/examplesDeveloper experience, examples, docs, and learning pathenhancementNew feature or request

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions