From ffaecac13e60ed8e97fb2af1e880a0015eb29dcb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alisdair Meredith <alisdairm@me.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 02:57:46 +0700
Subject: [PATCH] [dcl.type.general] Strike irrelevant footnote

It is odd to state that there is no special rule where none is
expected.  For the reference to C, does C23 even retain the
implicit int rule?
---
 source/declarations.tex | 7 -------
 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/source/declarations.tex b/source/declarations.tex
index d82e4bcb96..ec8e3ad7ab 100644
--- a/source/declarations.tex
+++ b/source/declarations.tex
@@ -1232,13 +1232,6 @@
 \grammarterm{cv-qualifier} shall appear in a complete
 \grammarterm{type-specifier-seq} or a complete
 \grammarterm{decl-specifier-seq}.
-\begin{footnote}
-There is no special
-provision for a \grammarterm{decl-specifier-seq} that
-lacks a \grammarterm{type-specifier} or that has a
-\grammarterm{type-specifier} that only specifies \grammarterm{cv-qualifier}{s}.
-The ``implicit int'' rule of C is no longer supported.
-\end{footnote}
 
 \pnum
 \begin{note}