From 9e76a7f17618ad4c1bca7bcebd37bee6e5ab46ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alisdair Meredith Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 23:39:03 +0700 Subject: [PATCH] [lex.literal.kinds] Strike incomplete footnote It may be that the notion of literal in C++ and constant in C were at one point close to a 1-1 mapping, but that it not strictly the case any more. C++ has user-defined literals, in C string-literals are distinct from constants, and C specifies enumerators as literals too. Rather thsn clean up the footnote, or make clear that the correspondance is weak, simply strike it. --- source/lex.tex | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/source/lex.tex b/source/lex.tex index 8005b33374..289bbaf073 100644 --- a/source/lex.tex +++ b/source/lex.tex @@ -1149,10 +1149,6 @@ \indextext{constant}% \indextext{literal!constant}% There are several kinds of literals. -\begin{footnote} -The term ``literal'' generally designates, in this -document, those tokens that are called ``constants'' in C. -\end{footnote} \begin{bnf} \nontermdef{literal}\br