Add ROSCon 2025 Summary blog post#59
Conversation
|
|
||
| We made some observations based on the talks and how they fit with our ongoing. | ||
|
|
||
| 1. **Make versus Buy decision**: Broadly, tools seem to break down into: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This heading somehow doesn't make sense for me here. The two bullet points that follow don't seem to be related to make-vs-buy.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Re-reading, I can see what I intended, but you're right that it doesn't follow on logically. I've added some extra detail to try to make my intention more clear. What do you think?
|
|
||
| 2. **Technical vs Non-Technical Audience**: Most tools seem to be aimed at engineers who are actively developing their robots. However, as robots become more mature and scale up, non-technical users need to be able to monitor and perform basic debugging for robots. We are starting to see some tools offer high-level interfaces for non-technical users, such as the robot web server presented by Hilary Luo. | ||
|
|
||
| ## What This Means for the Guide |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
After reading this section I didn't actually get the sense that these conclusions are actually supported/implied by the preceding sections. It's also a bit weird, because conclusions shouldn't (can't logically) be more detailed and longer than the thing they conclude from.
I would hold these back because to they do not relate to "Logging and Observability at ROSCon 2025".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this was presented as a conclusion, but it's not really intended to be one. I don't think the blog post is long enough to need a conclusion.
The flow was meant to be:
- here are the talks we looked at
- here are the take-aways from the talks mixed with our own experience as robotics developers (more of an interpretation with extra context)
- here is how it will feed back into our work making the community guide
I've tried to make that a little more obvious, but not sure I've managed it. What are your thoughts here? Just trash the section, or try to massage it into the flow I wrote above?
|
@chfritz appreciate your comments on the blog post draft! Could you look at the updated changes, please? I've responded to your comments as well. |
2 participants
No description provided.