Skip to content

Should the CRWG start developing? #65

@mikelikesrobots

Description

@mikelikesrobots

Last night (2026-04-21) we talked about the possibility of the group developing together. Currently we host sessions, record and upload them, and occasionally gather our thoughts together into blog posts or documentation.

Is there any kind of development we'd like to do as a next step?

A couple of ideas that came up in meeting:

  1. Develop a Transitive Robotics capability. Use our research into Logging & Observability to determine what's more useful.
  2. Create and maintain reference architectures for cloud robotics setups. For example, a COS setup, a KubeEdge setup, and a Transitive setup.

What are your thoughts on expanding our output? @gtoff @chfritz @proan and anyone else interested in the group's direction.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions