Test Data CSV transition #1634
SFJohnson24
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 3 comments 6 replies
-
|
@SFJohnson24 , dev team: I vote for "a metadata csv file with 1 variable per row separate from the data csv file.". |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
this is how the dm with metadata option looks using CSV editor from the excel viewer extension. @eljanssens this seems to be what you suggested on slack--easy to edit/alter the csv in columnar format
https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=GrapeCity.gc-excelviewer
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
6 replies
-
|
I have no real preference, I can easily handle both. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment


Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The dev team is seeking input from Rule Authors regarding the transition of test data/rules into github.
https://github.com/cdisc-org/cdisc-rules-engine/issues/1559#issuecomment-3952292326
@eljanssens @JozefAerts @mhungria @alexfurmenkov
We are currently discussing formatting of the CSV as we move the test data from sharepoint into github. We are debating the merits of a single file with the column metadata at the top:
versus a metadata csv file with 1 variable per row separate from the data csv file. It would look something like this:
@gerrycampion pointed out that most csv tools (and vscode extensions) expect a single row as a header for csv files, so it messes up the filtering and sorting. Also, the rfc says "an optional header line"
We would love input on the preferred formatting to help facilitate authoring
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions