Why this issue exists
Memory Engine is a local-first room-memory sound installation prototype.
Public-safe boundary
Memory Engine is publicly shareable as a public-safe excerpt: a consent-aware room-memory system that responds to ambient conditions without treating people as datasets. Public material should stay diagrammatic or redacted unless a proof object clearly shows room-state behavior without exposing participants, identifiable memories, or retention logic that exceeds the actual evidence.
Next action
Capture a test-space installation photo, sound artifact, and privacy boundary note before using stronger "room memory" language.
Action context
- Effort: unspecified
- Stack: camera, obsidian, hardware
- Domain: Installation, Local-First, Sound
- Status: active
- Maturity: alpha
Missing evidence
- Installation photo
- sound capture
- privacy boundary note
Allowed outputs
- evidence capture checklist
- repo issue
- public-safe portfolio draft
- small experiment plan
- public-safe diagram draft
Do not produce
- Participant imagery, identifiable room recordings, individualized memory traces, raw retention examples, precise room context, and any capture that could turn ambient sensing into personal surveillance should remain private.
- Avoid "learns the room" language unless the sensing model and non-surveillance limits are explicit.
- Use "local-first sound installation prototype" and lead with the privacy boundary.
Acceptance criteria
Notes
- Portfolio blocker: True
- Evidence blocker: True
- Public claim: Local-first room-memory sound installation prototype
- Private caveat: Avoid "learns the room" language unless the sensing model and non-surveillance limits are explicit.
- Evidence note: Memory Engine - installation and privacy boundary
Why this issue exists
Memory Engine is a local-first room-memory sound installation prototype.
Public-safe boundary
Memory Engine is publicly shareable as a public-safe excerpt: a consent-aware room-memory system that responds to ambient conditions without treating people as datasets. Public material should stay diagrammatic or redacted unless a proof object clearly shows room-state behavior without exposing participants, identifiable memories, or retention logic that exceeds the actual evidence.
Next action
Capture a test-space installation photo, sound artifact, and privacy boundary note before using stronger "room memory" language.
Action context
Missing evidence
Allowed outputs
Do not produce
Acceptance criteria
Memory Engine - installation and privacy boundaryNotes