Skip to content

Commit d80dadb

Browse files
leogdionclaude
andcommitted
Complete 'When to Use SyntaxKit' DocC tutorial with practical guidance
- Streamlined tutorial with clear decision framework and real-world examples - Added concrete examples: Swift macros, database schema generation, developer tools - Included anti-patterns and performance considerations - Created practical decision-making framework with specific scenarios - Enhanced tutorial flow for 10-15 minute completion time - Task 3 and all subtasks completed successfully 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
1 parent 9cebee1 commit d80dadb

2 files changed

Lines changed: 130 additions & 320 deletions

File tree

.taskmaster/tasks/tasks.json

Lines changed: 9 additions & 9 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@
174174
"dependencies": [
175175
2
176176
],
177-
"status": "in-progress",
177+
"status": "done",
178178
"subtasks": [
179179
{
180180
"id": 1,
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@
193193
"3.1"
194194
],
195195
"details": "Create visual flowchart in DocC-compatible format showing decision points, conditions, and outcomes for choosing SyntaxKit vs alternatives.",
196-
"status": "in-progress",
196+
"status": "done",
197197
"testStrategy": ""
198198
},
199199
{
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@
204204
"3.1"
205205
],
206206
"details": "Build comprehensive table comparing scenarios, showing clear advantages/disadvantages, performance implications, and maintenance considerations.",
207-
"status": "pending",
207+
"status": "done",
208208
"testStrategy": ""
209209
},
210210
{
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@
216216
"3.3"
217217
],
218218
"details": "Write 3-4 concrete examples with before/after code showing clear value proposition. Include macro generation, API client creation, and schema-to-Swift examples.",
219-
"status": "pending",
219+
"status": "done",
220220
"testStrategy": ""
221221
},
222222
{
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@
227227
"3.3"
228228
],
229229
"details": "List scenarios where SyntaxKit shouldn't be used, explain why static code is better, provide examples of over-engineering with SyntaxKit.",
230-
"status": "pending",
230+
"status": "done",
231231
"testStrategy": ""
232232
},
233233
{
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@
239239
"3.5"
240240
],
241241
"details": "Document build-time performance impact, runtime considerations, long-term maintenance implications, and team collaboration factors.",
242-
"status": "pending",
242+
"status": "done",
243243
"testStrategy": ""
244244
},
245245
{
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@
250250
"3.6"
251251
],
252252
"details": "Link to Quick Start tutorial, macro examples, best practices article, and external resources. Ensure proper DocC cross-referencing.",
253-
"status": "pending",
253+
"status": "done",
254254
"testStrategy": ""
255255
},
256256
{
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@
261261
"3.7"
262262
],
263263
"details": "Structure content as guided tutorial with clear steps, checkpoints, and takeaways. Ensure 10-15 minute completion time and clear decision-making outcomes.",
264-
"status": "pending",
264+
"status": "done",
265265
"testStrategy": ""
266266
}
267267
]
@@ -905,7 +905,7 @@
905905
],
906906
"metadata": {
907907
"created": "2025-08-31T16:26:25.262Z",
908-
"updated": "2025-09-01T03:08:41.953Z",
908+
"updated": "2025-09-01T13:29:51.107Z",
909909
"description": "Tasks for master context"
910910
}
911911
}

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)