Skip to content

Conversation

@derekslager
Copy link
Contributor

@derekslager derekslager commented Dec 5, 2025

Minor spelling / grammar fixes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Improved README with grammar corrections and punctuation adjustments for enhanced clarity and readability.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Minor spelling / grammar fixes.
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 5, 2025

Walkthrough

Grammar and punctuation corrections to README.md, including fixing "it's" to "its," "your are" to "you are," and "If your not using" to "If you are not using," along with adding trailing periods to improve sentence closure.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
README Grammar and Punctuation Fixes
README.md
Corrected grammatical errors: "it's" → "its", "your are" → "you are", "If your not using" → "If you are not using"; added trailing periods for sentence closure

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • Purely cosmetic/textual corrections to documentation; no logic, functionality, or code changes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

A comma here, a period there,
Grammar corrected with loving care,
"Its" now shines where "it's" once sat,
The README's cleaner—imagine that! 📝✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'Update README.md' is vague and generic, using non-descriptive language that doesn't convey the specific nature of the changes (grammar and spelling fixes). Consider a more descriptive title like 'Fix grammar and spelling errors in README.md' to clearly communicate the nature of the changes to reviewers.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2f7940d and d1e011e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📚 Learning: 2025-08-02T20:23:28.499Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: bhauman/clojure-mcp PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T20:23:28.499Z
Learning: Applies to src/**/*.{clj,cljc} : Maintain atom-based state for consistent service access in MCP tools

Applied to files:

  • README.md
📚 Learning: 2025-08-02T20:23:28.499Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: bhauman/clojure-mcp PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T20:23:28.499Z
Learning: Applies to src/**/*.{clj,cljc} : Return structured data with both result and error status in MCP tools

Applied to files:

  • README.md
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

9-9: Grammar corrections look good.

All three changes are accurate:

  • Line 9: Corrected possessive "its" (not contraction "it's")
  • Line 11: Fixed to "you are" with added period
  • Line 13: Fixed to "you are not using" with added period

These minor documentation cleanups improve readability and correctness without altering the content.

Also applies to: 11-11, 13-13


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@bhauman bhauman merged commit 1dc9dd0 into bhauman:main Dec 7, 2025
1 check passed
@bhauman
Copy link
Owner

bhauman commented Dec 7, 2025

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants