Current Status: 2 of 7 packages meet 95% target
-
builder: 92% (acceptable as exemplar, no action needed)
-
models: 85% (NEEDS Phase 5)
-
tests: 90% (NEEDS Phase 5)
-
iterate: 76% (NEEDS full refactor)
-
output: 95%+ (COMPLETE ✅ with Plan 064 + 070)
-
jupyter: 95% (COMPLETE ✅)
-
settings: 78% (NEEDS full refactor)
-
Complete Plan 060 Framework Refactoring - Achieve 95%+ compliance for all packages
- models/ package enhancement (Plan 061) - NEEDS PHASE 5
- Current: 85% → Target: 95%+ compliance
- Phase 1: Foundation Cleanup (completed)
- Phase 2: Error Handling (ModelError hierarchy created)
- Phase 3: Type Safety (comprehensive type hints added)
- Phase 4: Test Coverage (60 tests passing)
- Phase 5: Enhanced compliance to reach 95%
- Additional method complexity reduction
- Complete test coverage (target 90%+)
- Full documentation update
- tests/ package enhancement (Plan 062) - NEEDS PHASE 5
- Current: 90% → Target: 95%+ compliance
- Phase 1: Test Organization (directory structure created)
- Phase 2: Method Refinement (utilities extracted)
- Phase 3: Error Handling (85 edge case tests added)
- Phase 4: Architectural Improvements (300+ tests)
- Phase 5: Final enhancements to reach 95%
- Complete fixture standardization
- Enhanced parameterization patterns
- Performance test expansion
- jupyter/ package refactor (Plan 063) - COMPLETE ✅
- Current: 71% → Achieved: 95%+ compliance
- Phase 1: Foundation Cleanup (test structure, imports, docstrings)
- Phase 2: Method Refinement (ui_builders.py extracted)
- Phase 3: Error Handling (JupyterError hierarchy with 8 types)
- Phase 4: Comprehensive Tests (unit/integration/fixtures added)
- All tests passing, comprehensive coverage achieved
- Manual Verification & Documentation - COMPLETE ✅:
- Manually tested all Jupyter functionality with explicit examples
- Created comprehensive example notebooks for all theories:
- Logos subtheories: counterfactual, extensional, modal, constitutive, relevance
- Exclusion theory: witness negation examples
- Imposition theory: semantic examples
- Standardized all notebooks with professional formatting
- Removed all '\n' display issues
- Fixed all syntax errors
- Created consistent countermodel/theorem display patterns
- Updated all notebook README files with comprehensive documentation
- output/ package refactor (Plan 064 + 070) - COMPLETE ✅
- Current: 72% → Achieved: 95%+ compliance
- Phase 1: Foundation (constants.py, errors.py, config.py created)
- Phase 2: Strategy Pattern (batch/sequential/interactive strategies)
- Phase 3: Formatter Pattern (markdown/json/notebook formatters)
- Phase 4: Manager Integration (OutputManager refactored)
- Phase 5: CLI Integration (--output flag with format selection)
- Phase 6: Documentation (comprehensive README.md files for all subdirectories)
- Cleanup: Removed 548+ lines of legacy code
- All tests passing (167 output tests, 218 builder tests)
- Plan 071: Notebook Generation via --save jupyter - COMPLETE ✅
- Issue: Generated notebooks didn't match reference notebook style/structure
- Problem Analysis: Data lost through intermediate formats, wrong cell structure
- Solution Design: Direct generation from examples.py using theory templates
- Plan: 071_notebook_generation_fix.md - COMPLETED ✅
- Implementation completed but revealed architectural coupling issues
- Plan 072: Complete Separation of Notebook Generation - COMPLETE ✅
- Problem: Notebook generation coupled with JSON/markdown pipeline
- Solution: Independent notebook package working directly with module variables
- Plan: 072_notebook_generation_separation.md
- Implementation Tasks:
- Phase 1: Create independent notebook generation path
- Phase 2: Create new notebook package structure
- Phase 3: Refactor templates for direct generation
- Phase 4: Remove notebook generation from OutputManager
- Phase 5: Update CLI flow
- Benefits Achieved:
- Complete separation from JSON serialization (no more serialization errors)
- Direct access to module variables (no data transformation)
- No intermediate data layers (works directly from examples.py)
- Simpler, cleaner architecture (notebook/ package independent from output/)
- iterate/ package refactor (Plan 065) - MEDIUM PRIORITY (Week 3-4)
- Current: 76% → Target: 95%+ compliance
- Phase 1: Foundation Cleanup
- Phase 2: Method Refinement (complex algorithms)
- Phase 3: Error Handling (IterateError hierarchy)
- Phase 4: Architectural Improvements
- Phase 5: Complete Documentation & Testing (to reach 95%)
- settings/ package refactor (Plan 066) - LOW PRIORITY (Week 5)
- Current: 78% → Target: 95%+ compliance
- Phase 1: Foundation Cleanup
- Phase 2: Method Refinement
- Phase 3: Error Handling (SettingsError hierarchy)
- Phase 4: Architectural Improvements
- Phase 5: Full Compliance Enhancement (to reach 95%)
- Success Validation:
- Achieve framework average compliance ≥95% (current: 78.6%)
- All packages at 95%+ individual compliance
- All tests passing throughout refactoring
- Zero regression in functionality
- Update all package documentation post-refactor
- models/ package enhancement (Plan 061) - NEEDS PHASE 5
- witness subpackage - Abstract witness methodology/framework for reuse
- Create abstract base framework for witness-based approaches
- Define protocol for registering theory-specific witness predicates
- Abstract pattern for witness constraint generation
- Framework for witness-aware model evaluation
- Generic witness predicate querying interface
- Extract common methodological patterns (not specific predicates)
- Registration pattern for witness functions
- Constraint generation workflow
- Model adaptation strategies
- Witness evaluation protocols
- Implement flexible framework that theories can customize
- Allow theories to define their own witness predicates
- Support different witness function signatures per theory
- Enable theory-specific constraint patterns
- Refactor exclusion/ to use the abstract framework
- Adapt bimodal/ to use witness framework with bimodal-specific predicates
- Document witness methodology patterns for future theories
- Write framework tests that don't depend on specific predicates
- Create abstract base framework for witness-based approaches
- Bottom-Up Documentation Audit
- Phase 1: Audit lowest-level docs (test dirs, utils, helpers)
- Phase 2: Package-level README updates and link verification
- Phase 3: Framework component documentation consistency
- Phase 4: Top-level consolidation and redundancy removal
- Phase 5: Comprehensive link testing and validation
- Create documentation dependency graph to track relationships
- Generate checklist of all documentation files for systematic review
-
linting and cleanup
- Remove unused imports in
/home/benjamin/Documents/Philosophy/Projects/ModelChecker/Code/src/model_checker/builder/example.py - Run pylint systematically across entire codebase
- Fix all critical and major issues
- Remove unused imports in
-
output formatting improvements
- Replace empty set braces '{}' with Unicode empty set symbol '∅' in countermodel outputs
- Update output formatters to detect empty sets and use ∅ character
- Ensure proper Unicode encoding for the empty set symbol
- Test with various output formats (markdown, json, notebook)
- Replace empty set braces '{}' with Unicode empty set symbol '∅' in countermodel outputs
-
unit test coverage
- Check coverage metrics (target 80%+)
- Add missing test cases for new builder modules
- Update test documentation
- theory metadata completion
- Add proper citations (logos/CITATION.md)
- Implement versioning system
- model_checker core versioning
- Theory and subtheory versioning
- Ensure project builder integrates properly
- Complete license checking
- bimodal optimization
- Implement witness framework with bimodal-specific predicates
- Define bimodal witness functions (different from exclusion's)
- Use abstract framework for registration and constraint generation
- Adapt model evaluation for bimodal semantics
- Complete infinite times refactor
- Fix
print_over_timesto loop over all times - Remove/enforce
max_world_id - Clean up frame constraints
- Develop bimodal lambda-only strategy
- Update PyPI documentation
- Implement witness framework with bimodal-specific predicates
- exclusion completion
- Move from complete lattice to boolean lattice
- Compare with bilateral semantics
- Update links to docs moved to
history/ - Integrate
TECHNICAL_REFERENCE.mdintoARCHITECTURE.md - Run performance comparisons:
- Max atomic complexity
Nbefore timeout - Max sentence/atomic complexity before constraint overflow
- Max atomic complexity
- Complete
tests/README.md - Add missing standard files to
docs/directory
- Consider witness framework adoption
- Evaluate if Logos would benefit from witness predicates
- Define Logos-specific witness functions if applicable
- Move iterate components out of semantic.py
-
Pure Logic Implementation
- Create pure/ subdirectory structure
- Implement individual operator logics with just intro/elim rules
- Pure counterfactual logic
- Pure modal logic
- Pure relevance logic
- Pure ground logic
- Pure essence logic
- Document theorems and countermodels for each pure logic
- Create test suites for pure operator behaviors
-
Impure Logic Implementation
- Create impure/ subdirectory structure
- Implement single non-extensional + classical combinations
- Counterfactual + classical (defining other operators)
- Modal + classical variations
- Relevance + classical variations
- Document derived operators and their relationships
- Catalog theorems and countermodels for impure combinations
-
Interaction Logic Framework
- Create interaction/ subdirectory structure
- Implement multi-operator combinations
- Modal-counterfactual interactions
- Relevance-ground interactions
- Essence-counterfactual interactions
- Document complex interaction patterns
- Build comprehensive test coverage
-
Prerequisites
- Complete bimodal theory implementation
- Complete logos restructuring (Phase 1)
- Adapt bimodal temporal methods for logos framework
-
Tense Operator Implementation
- Design tense operator semantics for truthmaker framework
- Past operator (P)
- Future operator (F)
- Always past (H)
- Always future (G)
- Implement temporal accessibility relations
- Add temporal frame constraints
- Create temporal proposition evaluation
- Design tense operator semantics for truthmaker framework
-
Pure Tense Logic
- Implement standalone tense logic in pure/
- Document intro/elim rules
- Catalog basic temporal theorems
- Identify characteristic countermodels
-
Tense-Counterfactual Interaction Logic (CRITICAL)
- Create interaction/tense_counterfactual/ subdirectory
- Implement combined temporal-counterfactual semantics
- Past counterfactuals ("If it had been...")
- Future counterfactuals ("If it will be...")
- Temporal alternative selection
- Document interaction patterns
- Backtracking counterfactuals
- Forward-tracking counterfactuals
- Temporal rigidity constraints
- Develop comprehensive theorem catalog
- Build countermodel database for interactions
- Create visualization tools for temporal-modal structures
-
Other Tense Interactions
- Tense-modal combinations
- Tense-relevance interactions
- Tense-ground relationships
- Tense-essence connections
-
Unified Framework
- Ensure all logic types work within logos framework
- Create consistent API across pure/impure/interaction
- Implement logic type selection mechanism
- Build cross-logic comparison tools
-
Documentation and Examples
- Create comprehensive documentation for each logic type
- Build example notebooks for each combination
- Document migration path from current logos structure
- Create user guides for logic selection
- jupyter - Integrate with sequence output
- models - Extract as independent package
- settings - Simplify configuration system
- syntactic - Permit Unicode operators
- utils - Consolidate utility functions
-
Systematic Documentation Update (Bottom-Up Approach)
- Level 1: Deepest Component Documentation (Start Here)
- Theory-specific test directories (e.g.,
theory_lib/*/tests/README.md) - Package utility modules (e.g.,
builder/utils/,iterate/utils/) - Fixture and helper directories
- Check completeness, accuracy, and examples
- Theory-specific test directories (e.g.,
- Level 2: Package/Module Documentation
- Individual package READMEs (
builder/README.md,models/README.md, etc.) - Theory documentation (
theory_lib/logos/README.md, etc.) - Test suite documentation (
tests/unit/README.md, etc.) - Verify all internal links work
- Remove redundant information covered at higher levels
- Individual package READMEs (
- Level 3: Framework Component Documentation
- Main component READMEs (
src/model_checker/README.md) - Cross-package documentation (
docs/specs/README.md) - Maintenance standards (
maintenance/README.md) - Ensure consistency across all packages
- Verify cross-references between components
- Main component READMEs (
- Level 4: Top-Level Documentation
- Main
Code/README.mdfor v1.0 - Project-wide
Docs/README.md - Installation and setup guides
- Consolidate information, remove redundancy
- Ensure all downward links are valid
- Main
- Documentation Quality Checks
- All relative links tested and working
- No redundant information between levels
- Consistent terminology throughout
- Version numbers and dates updated
- Code examples tested and working
- File paths accurate and current
- No orphaned documentation files
- Cross-references bidirectional where appropriate
- Level 1: Deepest Component Documentation (Start Here)
-
Legacy Documentation Tasks
- Complete methodology documentation
- Update
/home/benjamin/Documents/Philosophy/Projects/ModelChecker/Docs/usage/WORKFLOW.md - Update
/home/benjamin/Documents/Philosophy/Projects/ModelChecker/Docs/usage/COMPARE_THEORIES.md - Revise
/home/benjamin/Documents/Philosophy/Projects/ModelChecker/Docs/theory/README.md
- iterate improvements
- Report when networkx not available
- Make dependencies explicit
- Update documentation for new builder structure
- jupyter verification and documentation - COMPLETE ✅
- Manual testing with explicit examples:
- Created and tested comprehensive notebooks for all theories
- Verified all model checking functionality through notebooks
- Tested countermodel and theorem display functionality
- Validated all operator implementations across theories
- Created comprehensive tutorial documentation:
- Example notebooks serve as step-by-step guides for each theory
- Working code examples for countermodels and theorems
- Professional formatting with clear result interpretation sections
- Comprehensive README documentation for each notebook directory
- All existing examples verified working
- Implement convenience methods (see
/home/benjamin/Documents/Philosophy/Projects/ModelChecker/Code/specs/CONV_METHODS.md) - Future enhancement
- Manual testing with explicit examples:
- Add comprehensive change log
- Create project wiki
- Decapitalize directory names for consistency
-
Builder refactor - Successfully modularized from monolithic 1267-line file:
- Extracted into: runner.py, loader.py, validation.py, serialize.py, translation.py, etc.
- Created proper test structure (unit/, integration/, e2e/)
- Maintained iterate integration
- Preserved output formats
- Achieved 92% compliance (exemplar package)
-
Iterate refactor - Extracted from semantic.py into dedicated package:
- Created modular structure: base.py, core.py, iterator.py, models.py, etc.
- All theories now have iterate support
- Documentation updated
- Currently at 76% compliance (needs enhancement to 95%)
- [~] models/ package refactor - Phases 1-4 complete (85% compliance achieved, needs Phase 5 for 95%)
- [~] tests/ package refactor - Phases 1-4 complete (90% compliance achieved, needs Phase 5 for 95%)
- jupyter/ package refactor - COMPLETE (95% compliance achieved ✅)
- [~] output/ package refactor - Needs notebook generation fix (see below)
- iterate/ package refactor - Not started (76% compliance, needs all phases for 95%)
- settings/ package refactor - Not started (78% compliance, needs all phases for 95%)
Problem: Current notebook generation fails due to module import issues when trying to reload examples.py files.
Solution: Template-based approach (Plan 071)
- Phase 1: Modify BuildModule to pass example definitions through pipeline
- Phase 2: Extend NotebookTemplate base class with complete notebook methods
- Phase 3: Refactor NotebookGenerator to use templates only (no file reloading)
- Phase 4: Update OutputManager to collect and pass example data
- Phase 5: Update all theory templates to provide complete notebook structure
Key Principles:
- Templates in notebooks/ directories provide all imports and setup
- Example data flows through normal execution pipeline
- No absolute paths or module reloading
- Theory-agnostic output/ directory
- Each theory controls its own notebook format completely
- All theories have docs/ directories (bimodal, exclusion, imposition, logos)
- Exclusion semantics fully functional with witness predicates
- Fixed exclusion falsify attribute error (inherits from LogosSemantics)
- Reorganized EX_TH_2 to EX_CM_23 (disjunctive syllogism)
- Added relative imports requirement to CODE_ORGANIZATION.md
- Renamed pypi_link_requirements.md to PYPI_LINK_REQUIREMENTS.md
- Updated maintenance/README.md with new standards
- Added TEST_STATUS.md and TEST_ORGANIZATION.md
- Removed all output_ directories
- Fixed test expectations in exclusion theory
Progress Summary:
- Builder refactor: COMPLETE at 92% compliance (exemplar package, no further work needed)
- Jupyter refactor: COMPLETE at 95% compliance ✅
- Output refactor: COMPLETE at 95% compliance ✅
- Iterate extraction: COMPLETE but at 76% compliance (needs refactoring to 95%)
- Models package: Phases 1-4 done, stuck at 85% (needs Phase 5 for 95%)
- Tests package: Phases 1-4 done, stuck at 90% (needs Phase 5 for 95%)
- Settings package: Not started (78% compliance)
Critical Path to v1.0: Complete ALL packages to ≥95% compliance
Immediate Priorities (in order):
- Fix notebook generation - Template-based approach (Plan 071)
- Complete Phase 5 for models/ - Push from 85% to 95% compliance
- Complete Phase 5 for tests/ - Push from 90% to 95% compliance
- Full refactor of iterate/ - Already extracted but needs 76% → 95%
- Full refactor of settings/ - Closest to target at 78%
Success Criteria: No package below 95% compliance (currently TWO packages meet this: jupyter and output)
Secondary Priority: The witness framework abstraction, which will:
- Provide a general methodology for witness-based approaches
- Allow each theory to define its own specific witness predicates
- Create a reusable framework pattern without forcing theories to share predicates
- Enable bimodal and exclusion to use the same framework with different witness functions
Major Future Enhancement: Logos Theory Expansion (Post-v1.0)
The logos theory will undergo a major restructuring and expansion:
-
Restructuring into Logic Types:
- Pure logics: Individual operators with intro/elim rules only
- Impure logics: Single non-extensional + classical operators
- Interaction logics: Multiple non-extensional operator combinations
-
Tense Operator Integration (Major undertaking post-bimodal):
- Adapt bimodal temporal methods to truthmaker framework
- Implement P, F, H, G operators with temporal accessibility
- Create critical tense-counterfactual interaction logic
-
Tense-Counterfactual Interactions (Especially important):
- Past/future counterfactuals
- Backtracking and forward-tracking patterns
- Temporal rigidity constraints
- Comprehensive theorem and countermodel catalogs
Quality Focus: With major refactoring done, focus shifts to:
- Code quality (linting, unused imports)
- Test coverage improvements
- Documentation updates for the new architecture
The project is now much closer to v1.0 release with the major architectural improvements completed!