Hi! I'm using the household microdata from basedosdados.br_ibge_censo_demografico.microdados_domicilio_2010 and trying to map it to spatial boundaries using geobr shapefiles, but I'm finding a mismatch in the área de ponderação codes for Rio de Janeiro.
The Issue:
-Rio de Janeiro household microdata has área de ponderação codes like: 3304557006001, 3304557006154, 3304557006145, etc. (200 unique áreas)
-geobr shapefile (read_weighting_area("RJ", year=2010)) has área codes like: 3304557005110, 3304557005112, 3304557005111, etc. (also 200 áreas)
The codes are completely different (starting with 006 vs 005) so none of them match when I try to merge the data, but São Paulo works.
My Questions:
-Are the área de ponderação codes in the Rio microdata correct?
-Which shapefiles should I use to match these 006 codes for Rio?
-Is there a crosswalk file or documentation explaining this difference?
Thank you!
Hi! I'm using the household microdata from basedosdados.br_ibge_censo_demografico.microdados_domicilio_2010 and trying to map it to spatial boundaries using geobr shapefiles, but I'm finding a mismatch in the área de ponderação codes for Rio de Janeiro.
The Issue:
-Rio de Janeiro household microdata has área de ponderação codes like: 3304557006001, 3304557006154, 3304557006145, etc. (200 unique áreas)
-geobr shapefile (read_weighting_area("RJ", year=2010)) has área codes like: 3304557005110, 3304557005112, 3304557005111, etc. (also 200 áreas)
The codes are completely different (starting with 006 vs 005) so none of them match when I try to merge the data, but São Paulo works.
My Questions:
-Are the área de ponderação codes in the Rio microdata correct?
-Which shapefiles should I use to match these 006 codes for Rio?
-Is there a crosswalk file or documentation explaining this difference?
Thank you!