Skip to content

Add distinction between "info" and "fallback" messages #4006

@andygrove

Description

@andygrove

What is the problem the feature request solves?

Comet currently uses "withInfo" to add information messages to the plan and also uses it to indicate that the operator/expression should fall back to Spark.

It would be nice to have the ability to tag plans with purely informational messages that do not indicate that the plan should fall back.

Describe the potential solution

No response

Additional context

No response

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

enhancementNew feature or requestpriority:lowMinor issues, test failures, tooling, cosmetic

Type

No type
No fields configured for issues without a type.

Projects

No projects

Milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions