feat(venice): add reasoning options#2082
Draft
rekram1-node wants to merge 3 commits into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
reasoning_optionswithout treating/modelscapability metadata as authoritative over curated evidencedocumented override > existing curated options > catalog options for uncurated new models[]establishes fixed reasoningSources and conflicts
/modelsmetadata currently conflicts with the guide for Claude 4.5/4.6, GPT-5.2/Codex, Gemini Flash, Kimi K2.5, Qwen 3.5 35B, and GLM 5.1generate-venice.tsGenerator policy
reasoning_options, including[], survive stale or false catalog claimsexisting === null) whensupportsReasoningEffort=trueand options are present; existing unresolved TOMLs remain undefinedsupportsReasoningEffort=falsealone never manufactures[]noneeffort valueProvisional unresolved models
No Venice-specific effort proof was found for these current endpoints, so the PR intentionally leaves
reasoning_optionsundefined rather than asserting fixed reasoning:These require funded Venice inference probes. The prior probe budget was exhausted, so no new inference requests were made for this correction.
Verification
bun test packages/core/test/venice-generator.test.ts: 8 passed, 0 failedenv -u VENICE_API_KEY bun run venice:generate --dry-run: no writes; corrected mappings preserved; 17 catalog discrepancies reported; only 15 unrelated new catalog models and 2 unrelated pricing updates proposedbun validate: passedgit diff --check: passedThis PR remains draft pending funded live verification of provisional and unresolved controls.