Skip to content

CONSISTENCY_REVIEW.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
146 lines (100 loc) · 5.43 KB

CONSISTENCY_REVIEW.md

File metadata and controls

146 lines (100 loc) · 5.43 KB

Resume Tokens Documentation Consistency Review

Task: Subtask 3-3 - Final consistency review across all documentation Date: 2026-01-29 Status: ✅ PASSED

Review Summary

Comprehensive consistency review completed for the Resume Tokens documentation across:

  • docs/RESUME_TOKENS_DESIGN.md (6,848 lines)
  • docs/INTAKE_CONTRACT_SPEC.md (2,152 lines)

All verification criteria passed successfully.

✅ 1. Terminology Consistency - PASSED

Finding: Terminology follows language-specific conventions correctly.

  • resumeToken (camelCase): Used consistently in TypeScript, JSON, and JavaScript examples
  • resume_token (snake_case): Used correctly in Python functions and SQL table/column names
  • "resume token" (prose): Used consistently in English descriptions
  • rtok_ prefix: Used consistently in all example token values

Verdict: No inconsistencies found. Different casing follows established language conventions.

✅ 2. Example Formatting - PASSED

Finding: All code examples follow consistent formatting patterns.

  • TypeScript examples use consistent interface definitions
  • JSON examples follow the same structural patterns
  • HTTP examples show consistent headers and status codes
  • All code blocks properly formatted with appropriate syntax hints

Verdict: Formatting is uniform across both documents.

✅ 3. No Contradictions - PASSED

Finding: Cross-checked key concepts across both documents.

Concept INTAKE_CONTRACT_SPEC.md RESUME_TOKENS_DESIGN.md Match
Token format "opaque strings" "opaque bearer credentials" ✓
Expiration error 410 Gone 410 Gone ✓
Default TTL Delegates to design doc 7 days ✓
Concurrency ETag-style version ETag-style version ✓
Conflict status 409 Conflict 409 Conflict ✓

Verdict: No contradictions detected between documents.

✅ 4. All Acceptance Criteria Addressed - PASSED

All 10 acceptance criteria from spec.md are documented:

# Criterion Documentation Location Status
1 Creating draft returns resume token INTAKE_CONTRACT_SPEC.md §4.1
RESUME_TOKENS_DESIGN.md §2.1		 ✓
2 GET with token retrieves state INTAKE_CONTRACT_SPEC.md §4.9, §12.1.2
RESUME_TOKENS_DESIGN.md §7.2		 ✓
3 PATCH with token updates submission INTAKE_CONTRACT_SPEC.md §4.2, §12.1.2
RESUME_TOKENS_DESIGN.md §7.3		 ✓
4 Tokens include ETag-style version INTAKE_CONTRACT_SPEC.md §7.1.3
RESUME_TOKENS_DESIGN.md §4		 ✓
5 Stale version returns 409 Conflict INTAKE_CONTRACT_SPEC.md §3.2.2
RESUME_TOKENS_DESIGN.md §4.5		 ✓
6 Tokens are opaque strings INTAKE_CONTRACT_SPEC.md §7.1.1
RESUME_TOKENS_DESIGN.md §3.1		 ✓
7 Configurable expiration (7 days default) RESUME_TOKENS_DESIGN.md §5.3 ✓
8 Expired tokens return 410 Gone INTAKE_CONTRACT_SPEC.md §3.2.1
RESUME_TOKENS_DESIGN.md §5.4		 ✓
9 Token-based access without auth INTAKE_CONTRACT_SPEC.md §7.1.5
RESUME_TOKENS_DESIGN.md §6		 ✓
10 MCP tool server supports tokens INTAKE_CONTRACT_SPEC.md §12.2
RESUME_TOKENS_DESIGN.md §8		 ✓

Verdict: All acceptance criteria comprehensively documented.

✅ 5. Event Stream Integration - PASSED

Finding: Event stream integration is comprehensively documented.

In RESUME_TOKENS_DESIGN.md §9 Event Stream:

  • §9.1 Overview
  • §9.2 Event Types (token.created, token.accessed, token.updated, token.conflict, token.expired, token.handed_off)
  • §9.3 Event Payload Specification
  • §9.4 Event Emission Triggers
  • §9.5 Event Storage and Replay
  • §9.6 Monitoring and Alerting

In INTAKE_CONTRACT_SPEC.md §6 Event Stream:

  • Integration events documented (handoff.link_issued, handoff.resumed)
  • Cross-references to RESUME_TOKENS_DESIGN.md for token-specific events

Verdict: Event stream comprehensively documented with full lifecycle coverage.

✅ 6. Cross-References - PASSED

Finding: Bidirectional cross-references are properly implemented.

INTAKE_CONTRACT_SPEC.md → RESUME_TOKENS_DESIGN.md: 8 references

  • §7.1.1 → §3 (Token Format and Generation)
  • §7.1.2 → §2.2 (Token Lifecycle)
  • §7.1.3 → §4 (Optimistic Concurrency Control)
  • §7.1.4 → §5 (Token Storage and Expiration)
  • §7.1.5 → §6 (Cross-Actor Handoff)
  • §12.1.2 → §7 (HTTP API Bindings)
  • §12.2 → §8 (MCP Integration)
  • Multiple inline references

RESUME_TOKENS_DESIGN.md → INTAKE_CONTRACT_SPEC.md: 4 references

  • §1.1 → §2 (Submission Lifecycle)
  • §8.4 → §4 (Operations)
  • Multiple inline references

All cross-references use proper markdown links with section anchors.

Verdict: Cross-reference coverage is complete and bidirectional.

Final Verdict

✅ ALL CHECKS PASSED

The documentation is:

  1. Terminologically consistent (following language conventions)
  2. Uniformly formatted (consistent example structure)
  3. Contradiction-free (all concepts align across documents)
  4. Complete (all acceptance criteria addressed)
  5. Comprehensive (event stream fully documented)
  6. Well-linked (bidirectional cross-references in place)

Status: PRODUCTION READY ✅

The Resume Tokens documentation is ready for implementation and external review.

Reviewed by: auto-claude (subtask-3-3) Review Date: 2026-01-29