Correct keywords for table/feature blocks

[signalwerk]

The following keywords were missing from the list (but specified in the corresponding table/feature):

• nameid
• FSType
• name
• WeightClass
• WidthClass
• LowerOpSize
• UpperOpSize
• FamilyClass

The sorting of the keywords in the list was also not consistent (not alphabetical by keyword, not alphabetical by table/feature name, almost order of appearance in the specification). It is now sorted by the order of appearance in the specification (8.b, 9.a, 9.b, …).

[frankrolf]

Thank you for the update! Seems reasonable :-)

I’m curious – have you tested if these keywords have the intended effect when compiling a font?

    LowerOpSize <number>;
    UpperOpSize <number>;
    FamilyClass <number>;

Thanks again!

[signalwerk]

@frankrolf Thank you for your reply. I was not testing this. I was working on a .fea syntax highlighter and I just realized the inconsistency in the documentation. Because it was not otherwise mentioned and the documentation implies it is working, I mentioned it as implemented.

[frankrolf]

@signalwerk I hope you are aware of this: https://gitlab.com/saalen/highlight

I recently contributed .fea support to this package.

[signalwerk]

@frankrolf thank you for pointing that out. I use support in highlightjs but it's good to have your implementation. Great!

[skef]

Given the timing this should go through the https://github.com/adobe-type-tools/feature_file_workshops process. @signalwerk do you have any interest in doing a PR over there, or would you like us to? Either is fine -- this is less of a change than just clean-up and therefore cosmically on us.