You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: README.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ See [IBM360_TEST_RESULTS.md](IBM360_TEST_RESULTS.md) for full test output and an
264
264
Generative LLM models (Anthropic's Claude Opus and Sonnet, plus local models including Qwen Coder) have been used primarily as:
265
265
266
266
-**Test result summarisation** — Collating output from verification runs
267
-
-**Rubber duck debugging** — Talking through control flow transformations
267
+
-**Rubber duck debugging** — Talking through control flow transformations. I speak to the rubber duck, it speaks back to me.
268
268
-**Documentation drafting** — Under human review and editing
269
269
270
270
Code, architectural decisions, and the GOTO elimination work itself remain human-authored. The AI doesn't write the Fortran; it helps make sense of what the Fortran is doing.
0 commit comments