-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
Open
Description
Hi,
I have successfully fitted the models with runImpulseDE2().
However, upon examining the output, some up-regulated genes were incorrectly classified as down-regulated, and vice versa.
Below are some examples
Examining the fitting results
This one is predicted as up-regulated and reflects the normalized counts.
get_lsModelFits(obj=de.df)$case$Gm2824
$lsImpulseFit
$lsImpulseFit$vecImpulseParam
beta h0 h1 h2 t1 t2
1.018975e+01 2.700061e+01 1.206801e+02 5.721416e-05 2.278622e+01 2.788867e+01
$lsImpulseFit$vecImpulseValue
1a 2a 3a 2b 1b 3b 1c 2c 3c
2.700061e+01 2.700061e+01 2.700061e+01 1.206660e+02 1.206660e+02 1.206660e+02 5.721416e-05 5.721416e-05 5.721416e-05
$lsImpulseFit$lsvecBatchFactors
NULL
$lsImpulseFit$scaDispParam
Gm2824
24.88971
$lsImpulseFit$scaLL
[1] -22.44949
$lsImpulseFit$scaConvergence
[1] 0This one predicts up-regulated, but the normalized counts say otherwise.
get_lsModelFits(obj=de.df)$case$Jak3
$lsImpulseFit
$lsImpulseFit$vecImpulseParam
beta h0 h1 h2 t1 t2
1.167168e+01 6.676505e+00 4.295190e-05 1.500012e+01 1.955861e+01 3.398591e+01
$lsImpulseFit$vecImpulseValue
1a 2a 3a 2b 1b 3b 1c 2c 3c
6.666680e+00 6.666680e+00 6.666680e+00 4.295190e-05 4.295190e-05 4.295190e-05 1.500012e+01 1.500012e+01 1.500012e+01
$lsImpulseFit$lsvecBatchFactors
NULL
$lsImpulseFit$scaDispParam
Jak3
7.301456
$lsImpulseFit$scaLL
[1] -15.34086
$lsImpulseFit$scaConvergence
[1] 0
Maybe I misunderstood model fitting output?
Thanks,
D
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels
