Skip to content

Question about removing continuous confounders #39

@lovebaboon1989

Description

@lovebaboon1989

Hi there,
I found it very helpful using ImpulseDE2 over longitudinal data while controlling for several other confounding variables, but I just found maybe these confounding variables that are given to the paramter 'vecConfounders ' should be categorical variables only. If we also want to remove the confounding effect of some continuous variable, is it possible? or is it reasonable?
The reason why I am asking this question is that when I tried removing a PMI (post mortem interval) effect using ImpulseDE2 to identify DEGs over time course in a human AD RNAseq project, note that PMI is different for each sample, and got nothing from p-adj and p-nominal DEGs. And I hypothesize that if we treat PMI as a confounding variable, then each sample is an independent 'batch', or single time point, thus cannot form a curve over the time course.
I was wondering if my understanding is correct, or do you have any suggestions over the issue of controlling confounding effects from continuous variables, thanks a lot!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions