Skip to content

CIFAR-100 accuracy lower than reported in the paper (practical setting) #7

@Juseok-Jeon

Description

@Juseok-Jeon

Hello, thank you for sharing this great work.

I have a question regarding the reported performance on CIFAR-100.
According to the paper, the accuracy under the practical setting is around 46–47%. However, when I reproduced the experiment using the provided implementation, the accuracy I obtained is around 43%.

I tried to follow the settings described in the paper as closely as possible, but there is still a noticeable gap in performance.

Could you let me know if there are any important implementation details, hyperparameters, or training settings that might affect this result?

Thank you for your help.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions