Describe the bug
Clojure dart is not able to handle this scenario where a function is defined and used in a subsequent macro.
To Reproduce
(defn gensyms [amt]
(vec (repeatedly amt gensym)))
(defmacro mk-comp-navs []
;; rest of fn altered for brevity...
(gensyms 1)
)
Syntax error compiling at (test.cljd:14:3).
Faulty form (defmacro mk-comp-navs [] (gensyms 1))
Expected behavior
This should work.
No doubt because of ClojureDart's two phase macro-expansion, it's not aware of the function defined a few lines above.
This is something that is possible in cljs, so presumably the two phases need to work more in parallel than in sequence, or effectively behave as such.
Assume you're aware of cljs quirks https://code.thheller.com/blog/shadow-cljs/2019/10/12/clojurescript-macros.html
but these require defining aliases etc.
Additional context
I was trying to convert the specter library and came across a problem running the following code.
Pointing cljd at more clj code will highlight more differences with the language. More reason to champion the following suggestion ;-)
https://clojurians.slack.com/archives/C03A6GE8D32/p1729680676173319
I suggest this difference go under the Completeness status of the project given the difference with Clojure core.
Describe the bug
Clojure dart is not able to handle this scenario where a function is defined and used in a subsequent macro.
To Reproduce
Expected behavior
This should work.
No doubt because of ClojureDart's two phase macro-expansion, it's not aware of the function defined a few lines above.
This is something that is possible in
cljs, so presumably the two phases need to work more in parallel than in sequence, or effectively behave as such.Assume you're aware of
cljsquirks https://code.thheller.com/blog/shadow-cljs/2019/10/12/clojurescript-macros.htmlbut these require defining aliases etc.
Additional context
I was trying to convert the
specterlibrary and came across a problem running the following code.Pointing
cljdat morecljcode will highlight more differences with the language. More reason to champion the following suggestion ;-)https://clojurians.slack.com/archives/C03A6GE8D32/p1729680676173319
I suggest this difference go under the
Completeness statusof the project given the difference with Clojure core.