Weird Double Drawing Of PlayerObject Ontop Of Everything

[FluffyDuckyEU]

I don't understand this line, it seems like a hack and it is having an impact on the wing effects.

https://github.com/Suprcode/mir3-zircon/blob/3a890d540ed4fa4a9b90f0089d2c3cadf2ef05e4/Client/Scenes/Views/MapControl.cs#L405

Removing it has a consequence, so it's not so simple, i assume this is the reason this was added.

• Player does not implicitly show when hiding under objects (without mouse over).
• We lose the colour overlay when hiding under objects (this behaviour could be moved elsewhere though?).

With This Line

Without This Line

[FluffyDuckyEU]

I feel like this should be handled as part of PlayerObject Draw() method.

https://github.com/Suprcode/mir3-zircon/blob/3a890d540ed4fa4a9b90f0089d2c3cadf2ef05e4/Client/Models/PlayerObject.cs#L801

Imo maybe I should just reimplement that whole Draw method while i'm touching it :|

[Suprcode]

Yes double drawing has always been a requirement to see yourself behind objects.

I don't think you lose the colour when you hover if that's what you meant. Just a side effect of the draw blend / opacity making the image brighter and losing colour I think.

I'm not sure how you'd plan to get around needing to double draw. The simplest fix would be to just double draw the wings too - I can't think of any other way you can resolve it in a single draw.

[FluffyDuckyEU]

It seems like a waste to process twice, i was hoping to be able to determine whether the character is hidden whilst processing in the PlayerObject.Draw but because the map object spans over multiple cells whilst only actually being assigned to one cell that the player isn't likely on makes it not possible like you said :/

[Suprcode]

To be honest you probably can work it out. You'd have to look at the current X coord, and all Y coordinates directly below the player (plus maybe +/- 1 X due to overflowing image to out cells). Then you'd need to look at all 3 layer images to see if the cell height reaches the player.

It'll certainly be an expensive calculation to constantly do, so you'd need to ensure its cached - which might use abit of memory after a certain period.

[Suprcode]

Thinking about it, you're really only going to need to calculate 3 cells below you - each time you move. So maybe not that expensive and worth looking in to. Certainly would be better than drawing opacity over the player constantly

[FluffyDuckyEU]

I thought some map objects were quite tall, let me see if I can investigate that as a separate thing.

[Suprcode]

They are, but there's only 3 cells below you. Any objects lower than that won't get drawn, even if they're more than 3 cells tall. I think.

[FluffyDuckyEU]

Here is the same example. This particular object is 1x13 size.

[FluffyDuckyEU]

Do you think it's still possible to be able to calculate a top image that is up to maybe 10 cells away from your character?

Sorry for the horrible pink lines, i don't know where i found this program but it does the job for viewing the map😅

[FluffyDuckyEU]

The more I think about it, the more I think it's not possible, how would you also handle a character half under shelter and half not? The double draw handles this, but would you end up with the draw fully oqaue not opaque at all if you had this situation with manually worked out solution?

[Suprcode]

You'd have to just double draw as soon as the feet/player cell is in the area. But it still means 99% of the time you're not double drawing.

Maybe write the function to search for 10 coords below you and see how the performance is. Since you only need to do it once every time you move, it'll probably be fine

[FluffyDuckyEU]

I may be thinking about this too simply, but using the cell positions I don't think is enough to work.

Maybe you have something in mind that i don't, when you say:

Then you'd need to look at all 3 layer images to see if the cell height reaches the player.

How would I know if the map object image overflow lands on top of the player fully or not? The only way I can see this being achieved is if you check whether the images intersect, not by cells but by pixel maybe?

[Suprcode]

The images only ever go as high as they have atleast 1 pixel in them. As you can see from below the pink cells show the bottom of each image (where its physically placed).

So all you need to do is get the height of the image, divide is by the constant cell height - that'll give you the cells tall an image is.

then as you loop down your Y coord - you check if the player coord is greater than the Y coord minus the image height. If it is, you know the player is over it.

player Y = 100

checking Y coord = 105
105's image height = 5

if (100 > 105 - 5) Player is behind image.

image height will always be minimum of 1. So in most cases for a single cell image

if (100 > 101 - 1) player not behind

(you'll need to do this on front and middle layers)

Should be as simple as that. Obviously you're not going to be able to know if just a foot is behind the image, but you're still massively reducing when you have to double draw the player.

[Suprcode]

I've given this a quick go, and although it does kind of work - it certainly not perfect.

public bool IsBehindObject()
        {
            if (User == null) return false;

            var location = User.CurrentLocation;

            IsBehind = false;

            for (int offset = 0; offset < 20; offset++)
            {
                var y = location.Y + offset;

                var cell = Cells[location.X, y];

                if (cell == null) continue;

                LibraryFile file;
                MirLibrary library;

                if (Libraries.KROrder.TryGetValue(cell.MiddleFile, out file) && file != LibraryFile.Tilesc && CEnvir.LibraryList.TryGetValue(file, out library))
                {
                    int index = cell.MiddleImage - 1;

                    Size s = library.GetSize(index);

                    var cellsTall = s.Height / CellHeight;

                    if (location.Y > (location.Y + offset - cellsTall))
                    {
                        IsBehind = true;
                        break;
                    }
                }

                if (Libraries.KROrder.TryGetValue(cell.FrontFile, out file) && file != LibraryFile.Tilesc && CEnvir.LibraryList.TryGetValue(file, out library))
                {
                    int index = cell.FrontImage - 1;

                    Size s = library.GetSize(index);

                    var cellsTall = s.Height / CellHeight;

                    if (location.Y > (location.Y + offset - cellsTall))
                    {
                        IsBehind = true;
                        break;
                    }
                }
            }

            System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine(IsBehind ? "true" : "false");

            return IsBehind;
        }

Then add an "IsBehind" variable to map control

call this line inside LocationChanged()

GameScene.Game.MapControl.IsBehindObject();

and finally wrap drawPlayer around the check

if (IsBehind)
            {
                MapObject.User.DrawPlayer(false);
            }

It would probably be much better just doing this check when the map gets drawn itself - and it doesn't always look to work, often i find myself double drawing when i'm not behind anything.

Ideally checking if there is a visible pixel on the image would be much better - but i can only think performance on that would be an issue.