Skip to content

Loss not consistent with mask2former loss #8

@AniTho

Description

@AniTho

Dear authors
In your paper, the additional loss mentioned is only consistent selection loss but diving deeper into the loss function that you have used with mask2former is different from the ones used in the original repository. In fact, extra loss (loss_bbox_panoptic) is used by you whereas mask2former, eclipse, balconpas and comformer don't use this additional loss term. Can you please provide source of the loss that is used?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions