📄 RFC Discussion: CTA Enhancement Layer
RFC: rfc-cta-enhancement.md
Status: 🟡 Draft
Author: @rjewett459
Created: 2025-05-24
🧠 Summary
This RFC proposes an enhanced CTA inference system for Smart Packets that includes:
- Contextual CTA weighting
- Multi-intent fallback behavior
- Optional user-defined CTA overrides
The goal is to make Smart Packets more flexible, intelligent, and aligned with packet author intent.
🔍 Points for Discussion
- Should
priority and fallback logic be required or optional?
- Should CTA rendering respect author overrides by default, or only in fallback cases?
- What implications does this have on mobile/voice-first packet delivery UX?
📎 Related Proposals
intentMap.json enhancements
- PulseID CTA sequence personalization (upcoming RFC)
- CTA button rendering guidelines for accessibility
✅ Next Steps
- Community feedback and review
- Possible prototype in Smart Packet Viewer
- If approved, formalize schema updates and begin integration
🗣️ Leave your thoughts, feedback, or suggested edits below.
📄 RFC Discussion: CTA Enhancement Layer
RFC:
rfc-cta-enhancement.mdStatus: 🟡 Draft
Author: @rjewett459
Created: 2025-05-24
🧠 Summary
This RFC proposes an enhanced CTA inference system for Smart Packets that includes:
The goal is to make Smart Packets more flexible, intelligent, and aligned with packet author intent.
🔍 Points for Discussion
priorityandfallbacklogic be required or optional?📎 Related Proposals
intentMap.jsonenhancements✅ Next Steps
🗣️ Leave your thoughts, feedback, or suggested edits below.