update credit

Author: meihuisu

CREDITS.md

@@ -30,43 +30,54 @@ Researchers that use the UCVM software should cite the primary UCVM software ref
 ### CVM-H
 * Shaw, J. H., A. Plesch, C. Tape, M. P. Suess, T. H. Jordan, G. Ely, E. Hauksson, J. Tromp, T. Tanimoto, R. Graves, K. Olsen, C. Nicholson, P. J. Maechling, C. Rivero, P. Lovely, C. M. Brankman, J. Munster (2015). Unified Structural Representation of the southern California crust and upper mantle. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 415 1, doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.01.016 SCEC Contribution 2004
 
-### CVM-S Model:
+### CVM-S
 * Magistrale, H, Day, S, Clayton, RW, Graves, RW (2000) The SCEC southern California reference three-dimensional seismic velocity model version 2. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 90(6B): S65–S76.
 * Kohler, MD, Magistrale, H, Clayton, RW (2003) Mantle heterogeneities and the SCEC reference three-dimensional seismic velocity model version 3. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 93(2): 757–774.
 
-### CVM-S4.26 and CVM-S4.26.M01
+### CVM-S4.26 
 * Lee, E.-J., P. Chen, T. H. Jordan, P. J. Maechling, M. A. M. Denolle, and G. C.Beroza (2014), Full 3-D tomography for crustal structure in Southern California based on the scattering-integral and the adjoint-wavefield methods, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 119, doi:10.1002/2014JB011346. SCEC Contribution 6093
 
+### CVM-S4.26.M01
+* Lee, E.-J., P. Chen, T. H. Jordan, P. J. Maechling, M. A. M. Denolle, and G. C.Beroza (2014), Full 3-D tomography for crustal structure in Southern California based on the scattering-integral and the adjoint-wavefield methods, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 119, doi:10.1002/2014JB011346. SCEC Contribution 6093
+* Taborda, R., Olsen, K. B., Graves, R. W., Silva, F., Khoshnevis, N., Savran, W. H., Roten, D., Shi, Z., Goulet, C. A., Bielak, J., Maechling, P. J., Cui, Y., & Jordan, T. H. (2016, 09). Verification and Validation of High-Frequency (fmax = 5 Hz) Ground Motion Simulations of the 2014 M 5.1 La Habra, California, earthquake. Poster Presentation at 2016 SCEC Annual Meeting.
+
 ### USGS Central California Model (cencal)
 * Brocher, Tom & Aagaard, Brad & Simpson, R. & Jachens, R.. (2006). The USGS 3D Seismic Velocity Model for Northern California. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. -1. 1266. 
 
-### ALBACORE Model:
+### ALBACORE
 * Bowden, D. C., Kohler, M. D., Tsai, V. C., & Weeraratne, D. S. (2016). Offshore southern California lithospheric velocity structure from noise cross-correlation functions. Journal of Geophysical Research, 121(5), 3415-3427. doi: 10.1002/2016JB012919.
 
-### Imperial Valley Model:
+### SSIP Imperial Valley Model
 * Persaud P., Y. Ma, J. M. Stock, J. Hole, G. Fuis and L. Han (2016), Fault zone characteristics and basin complexity in the southern Salton Trough, California , Geology, 44(9), p. 747-750, doi:10.1130/G38033.1.
 
-### Coachella Valley Model
-* Ajala, R., Persaud, P., Stock, J. M., Fuis, G. S., Hole, J. A., Goldman, M., & Scheirer, D. (2019). Three‐Dimensional Basin and Fault Structure From a Detailed Seismic Velocity Model of Coachella Valley, Southern California. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth,. doi: 10.1029/2018JB016260. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2018JB016260
+### SSIP Coachella Valley Model
+* Ajala, R., Persaud, P., Stock, J. M., Fuis, G. S., Hole, J. A., Goldman, M., & Scheirer, D. (2019). Three‐Dimensional Basin and Fault Structure From a Detailed Seismic Velocity Model of Coachella Valley, Southern California. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth,. doi: 10.1029/2018JB016260. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2018JB016260.
 
-### Wasatch Model:
+### Wasatch Model
 * Magistrale, H, Olsen, KB, Pechmann, JC (2008) Construction and verification of a Wasatch front community velocity model. Technical report no. HQGR.060012, 14 pp. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey.
 
-### Lin-Thurber Model:
-* Lin, G., C. H. Thurber, H. Zhang, E. Hauksson, P. Shearer, F. Waldhauser, T. M. Brocher, and J. Hardebeck (2010), A California statewide three-dimensional seismic velocity model from both absolute and differential times. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 100, 225-240. doi: 10.1785/0120090028. SCEC Contribution 1360
+### UW Statewide
+* Lin, G., C. H. Thurber, H. Zhang, E. Hauksson, P. Shearer, F. Waldhauser, T. M. Brocher, and J. Hardebeck (2010), A California statewide three-dimensional seismic velocity model from both absolute and differential times. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 100, 225-240. doi: 10.1785/0120090028. SCEC Contribution 1360.
 
-### USGS San Francisco Bay Model:
+### USGS San Francisco Bay 
+* Aagaard, B.T., and Hirakawa, E.T., 2021, San Francisco Bay region 3D seismic velocity model v21.1: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9TRDCHE.
 
-### UW San Francisco Bay Model:
+### UW San Francisco Bay 
+* Guo, H., T. Taira, A. Nayak, C. H. Thurber, and E. Hirakawa, Three-dimensional seismic velocity models for the San Francisco Bay region, California from joint body-wave and surface-wave tomography validated by waveform simulation, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, submitted.
 
-### CANVAS Model:
+### CANVAS 
 * Doody, C., Rodgers, A., Afanasiev, M., Boehm, C., Krischer, L., Chiang, A., & Simmons, N. (2023). 
        CANVAS: An adjoint waveform tomography model of California and Nevada.
        Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 128(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JB027583
 * Doody, C. (2023). Dataset for "CANVAS: An adjoint waveform tomography model of California and Nevada"
        [Data set]. In Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (Vol. 128, Number 12). 
        Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415562
 
+### CVM-H Basins
+* Plesch, A., C.H. Thurber, C. Tape, and  J.H. Shaw (2021, 08), The SCEC CVM effort: new basin models, enhanced access and tomographic updates. Oral Presentation at 2021 SCEC Annual Meeting.
+
+### Digital Elevation Model
+
 ### Ely/Jordan GTL 
 * Ely, G., T. H. Jordan, P. Small, P. J. Maechling (2010), A Vs30-derived Near-surface Seismic Velocity Model Abstract S51A-1907, presented at 2010 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, Calif., 13-17 Dec.
 
@@ -79,9 +90,6 @@ Researchers that use the UCVM software should cite the primary UCVM software ref
 ### Thompson California Vs30 Model
 * Thompson, E.M. (2022), An Updated Vs30 Map for California with Geologic and Topographic Constraints (ver. 2.0, July 2022): U.S. Geological Survey data release, doi:10.5066/F7JQ108S.
 
-### CVM-H Basins
-* Plesch, A., C.H. Thurber, C. Tape, and  J.H. Shaw (2021, 08), The SCEC CVM effort: new basin models, enhanced access and tomographic updates. Oral Presentation at 2021 SCEC Annual Meeting.
-
 ### Digital Elevation Model
 * USGS NED 1 arcsec DEM
 * https://apps.nationalmap.gov/datasets/