Skip to content

Question about control branch #17

@heishuini

Description

@heishuini

I noticed that there are two noisy_lq_latents in the code, which are ultimately fed into the transformer by concatenating them in sequence. This approach results in higher computational costs. May I ask:

  1. Compared to this, would channel-wise concatenation be better?
  2. If only one noisy_lq_latent is introduced, restoration can still be achieved, but the performance seems worse than your sequence concatenation method. Is my understanding correct?
    Thank you for your reply!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions