You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Description: <p>This dataset collects the vote of participants in mini-jury experiments. For each mini-jury, five participants had to give their opinion on a specific topic and an LLM was used to generate four statements agregating the participants' opinions. Participants could then rank the different propositions, and Schulze's method was used to select the winning statement. The original data was <a href="https://github.com/google-deepmind/habermas_machine">collected by Google DeepMind</a>, and was converted to the appropriate format by <a href="https://theo.delemazure.fr/>Théo Delemazure</a></p>
11
+
Description: <p>This dataset collects the vote of participants in mini-jury experiments. For each mini-jury, five participants had to give their opinion on a specific topic and an LLM was used to generate four statements agregating the participants' opinions. Participants could then rank the different propositions, and Schulze's method was used to select the winning statement. The original data was <a href="https://github.com/google-deepmind/habermas_machine">collected by Google DeepMind</a>, and was converted to the appropriate format by <a href="https://theo.delemazure.fr/>Théo Delemazure</a>.</p>
12
12
13
13
Required Citations: Michael Henry Tessler et al. <em>AI can help humans find common ground in democratic deliberation</em>. Science 386, 2024.
0 commit comments