Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
Hello @vzickus do you have any news to this? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
Apologies, I did not notice there was a reply @tpoint75 It seems to me that one should account for the repetition rate to normalise this properly. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Just wondering if this normalization should include a repetition rate factor? For example, the "coincidence" function needs a factor of repetition rate to normalise to 1 properly.
Taking a very long correlation window using a pulsed laser seems to make the g2 near zero > 1 for a coherent source.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions