Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Hi, you can't do that with the coincidence manipulator at once. But you remove the counts from Channel 1 and 3 if there is a count on 3 or 4 with the (inverted) herald manipulator and then you can build a coincidence of the left events on Channel 1 and 3: https://picoquant.github.io/snAPI/snAPI.Main.html#snAPI_Main_Manipulators_herald This removes the events on channel 1 and 2: and now you can build a coincidence: ..or you do it with without generating extra data in the stream: This removes the events on channel 1 and 2: and now you can build a coincidence: What are your results? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I am using the demo of the coincidence counting method in snAPI. The 'manipulator.coincidence' method has a 'chans' parameter that puts the input channel. However, unlike the Qucoa program, we cannot apply logical operations (and, or, not, etc.), so I can't exclude channels other than those I put in.
How can I apply the logical operations to select channels while using snAPI module?
ex) In the coincidence count with a total number of channels of 4, I want to measure [1,3] channels only coincidence count. so it exclude the [1,2,3], [1,3,4], and [1,2,3,4] counts. So I want to measure [1, ¬2, 3, ¬4], (1 & ¬2 & 3 & ¬4).
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions