context update should not require name

[sirpy]

When trying to update a context access rules if you do not supply the name field the update request will fail.

[donatandelic]

This is expected/correct behavior, since Context's schema defines name as a non-nullable field.

You can check the latest Context schema commit on Cerscan.

[sirpy]

@donatandelic so when i do context update i need to pass all the previous fields values other wise they are going to be nullified?

[donatandelic]

@sirpy That's correct. You're updating the Ceramic stream directly, so whatever content you post as a part of the update will be treated as a new (fresh) commit. The chain will not try to amend or assume changes.